Get ready for LightSquared broadband (Verizon and AT&T not fans)

By Matthew Lasar
Ars Technica

July 20, 2010

http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2010/07/get-ready-for-lightsquared-broadband-verizon-and-att-not-fans.ars


It's being billed as "the nation's first wholesale-only integrated wireless
broadband and satellite network." LightSquared is a new, coast-to-coast
4G-LTE wireless broadband operation backed up by satellite coverage. The
company will provide wholesale wireless to ISPs and cable operators—even
device makers, content providers, and just about anybody else.

And the venture will do so as "first truly open and net neutral wireless
network," according to LightSquared's elatedly worded press release, with
build-out expected to produce over 100,000 "direct and indirect private
sector jobs within five years."

LightSquared will function as "a disruptive force" in U.S. wireless "by
democratizing wireless broadband services," the firm's new Chair and CEO
Sanjiv Ahuja proclaimed on Tuesday.

"We're providing everyone, including underserved communities, with a fast,
reliable experience regardless of where they are located in the United
States. This network will return our country to its rightful position as a
leader in wireless broadband technology and solidify its reputation as the
center of global innovation."
Anybody can

We spoke with LightSquared spokesperson Tom Surface and asked him about that
"open and net neutral" phrase. Surface emphasized that those last two words
shouldn't be confused with "net neutrality." But the idea is that all comers
will be able to buy into LightSquared's capacity on a wholesale basis for
resale to the public, even a big-box retail store.

"Anybody can use our network," Surface promised.

When we suggested Best Buy as a hypothetical wholesale customer, he called
that a "good example," but went mum about actual prospects. "We are in
direct talks with these potential partners," Surface told us.

Still, the potential win here is pretty obvious. By selling wholesale
broadband access to entities that you don't usually associate with the
broadband business, there's huge potential to get high-speed access into
less populated regions where there aren't any traditional ISPs, but are
plenty of retailers who might consider filling the gap.
I was pleased

This consortium came into existence following the Harbinger Capital Partners
investment group's acquisition of SkyTerra Communications (now
LightSquared). SkyTerra will provide the spectrum for this venture. Nokia
Siemens will design the network, install equipment, and manage the
operation, which consists of about 40,000 cellular base stations.

And the whole shebang will cover over 92 percent of the U.S. population by
2015, the new company pledges.

Even FCC Chair Julius Genachowski has given the news his public blessing.

"I was pleased to learn of the formation of LightSquared today," Genachowski
announced. "This new nationwide 4G wireless broadband network represents
more than $7 billion of new investment, with the potential to create more
than 100,000 new private-sector jobs within five years. Today's announcement
shows that FCC policies are helping grow the U.S. economy by catalyzing
investment and job creation."
Three conditions

That last piece of credit-taking stems from the fact that the Commission
approved this deal, although not everybody's crazy about some of the
conditions to which Harbinger agreed.

Condition one has Harbinger promising that SkyTerra will not enter into an
agreement to make its 1525 to 1660.5 MHz band spectrum available to any
entity that happens to be "the largest or second largest wireless provider"
in the U.S., without receiving prior Commission approval.

Those unnamed providers would be AT&T and Verizon, who now rake in over 60
percent of mobile wireless sector revenue, according the FCC's latest mobile
competition report.

Approval, the fine print adds, "shall be at the sole discretion of the
Commission (or one of its Bureaus, acting on delegated authority)."

On top of that, SkyTerra will not provide more than 25 percent of its
terrestrial network access to those aforementioned providers without the
Commission's prior blessing. That's condition three. The point, again, is to
"promote competition and more access to the less densely populated areas,"
Surface reiterated.
Big isn't bad

Needless to say, AT&T and Verizon take strong exception to these measures,
based as they are, AT&T charges, on a "big is bad" set of assumptions about
revenue.

"Singling AT&T out for disparate secondary market treatment through
conditions that create regulatory hurdles that discourage other spectrum
holders from attempting to make spectrum or even excess wholesale capacity
available to AT&T is simply unacceptable," the company complained to the
agency in mid-April.

Ditto says Verizon, which has gotten into a bit of a tussle over the issue
with smaller carrier Sprint. The latter company supports the network
restriction conditions (which would not apply to Sprint, obviously). Like
AT&T, Verizon says they should be rescinded, but short of that the company
wants them applied to the entire wireless sector.

"Verizon Wireless's new proposal," Sprint insists, "is simply a collateral
attempt to nullify the narrowly tailored conditions SkyTerra proposed to
enhance the public interest benefits of the transaction." The wireless
giant's "proposal to extend the conditions across the industry demonstrates
its lack of conviction in its own arguments against them."

Even various Senators have gotten into the act—Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX),
Jim DeMint (R-SC) and two others questioning the propriety of the conditions
and the FCC's legal authority in this area.

The FCC is "presently reviewing" AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint's positions on
this issue, Genachowski wrote back to them the same day.

According to LightSquare's filings, the venture plans trial market test runs
in Phoenix and Denver early next year.
_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to