March 21, 2011

For Consumers, Little to Cheer in AT&T Deal
By JENNA WORTHAM
NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/22/technology/22phone.html?_r=1&ei=5065&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print


The $39 billion proposed merger of AT&T and T-Mobile could save the 
companies a lot of money. For everyone else, it could cost a lot of 
money. No sooner did the two companies announce a $39 billion merger on 
Sunday than industry analysts began assessing the impact on the biggest 
potential losers in the deal: consumers.

If approved by regulators, the merger would leave just three major 
cellular carriers in the United States, a development that consumer 
advocates warn could eventually lead to higher prices for a wide variety 
of services. For this reason the deal is likely to attract close 
scrutiny in Washington.

It is too early to say how much — or even whether — rates might rise for 
consumers, who on average pay $55 a month for their wireless plans, said 
Roger Entner, who tracks the wireless industry for the Nielsen Company. 
But while consumers may see some immediate benefits — in network 
quality, for example — they are not likely to benefit in the long run, 
some analysts and industry experts said.

The bottom line, they said, is that competition is likely to suffer, 
leading to higher prices and less innovation. That is because the deal 
would leave just AT&T, Verizon Wireless and the much smaller Sprint to 
divide up the voracious smartphone market — with the AT&T and T-Mobile 
union likely to dominate the market.

“Without some of the smaller competitors, you won’t have the competitive 
pressure that leads to lower prices and innovations and offerings among 
the carriers,” said Paul Reynolds, electronics editor at Consumer Reports.

AT&T maintains that the merger will be good for consumers.

“The benefits of this transaction are possible at this scale and on this 
timeline only from the combination of these two companies,” Randall L. 
Stephenson, chairman and president of AT&T, said in a call to investors 
and analysts on Monday. He added that the merger “will improve network 
quality” and “give more customers access to more services.”

Other analysts also had a rosier view, suggesting that AT&T may 
diversify its offerings if it acquires T-Mobile. T-Mobile has long built 
its reputation by offering affordable, low-rate cellphone plans, 
including ones that do not require annual contracts or a minimum voice plan.

“Having 30 million new subscribers might convince them to add more 
attractive data pricing,” said Chetan Sharma, an independent wireless 
analyst, referring to T-Mobile’s customer base. “Things like data family 
plans could become a reality.”

Whatever happens to prices, the availability of cellphone coverage in 
the United States is likely to expand, analysts said. AT&T and T-Mobile 
have invested in different parts of the country, and customers of the 
two companies would have access to a larger, combined network. 
Potentially, the acquisition of T-Mobile, with its additional wireless 
spectrum, could also help AT&T with the rollout of its next-generation 
wireless network, known as 4G.

Improved service and network quality could be another boon. T-Mobile and 
AT&T use the same underlying GSM cellphone technology, which should 
reduce any friction of blending the two networks. AT&T could take 
advantage of T-Mobile’s latest high-speed network, in which the company 
has invested millions to upgrade and bring online. By adding T-Mobile, 
AT&T will gain cell sites equivalent to the number it would have taken 
five years to build, experts say. All this means, in theory at least, 
that service should improve. But the cost to buy that coverage is likely 
to go up.

“Typically, the more competition there is, the faster prices drop,” Mr. 
Sharma said. “In a situation where there are two main carriers, pricing 
is not likely to move as much.”

One burning question raised by the potential of a merger with AT&T is 
what will happen to the wide range of inventive T-Mobile data plans, 
which are some of the lowest in the country, and have helped keep 
pressure on competitors. The company also offers a wider choice of 
smartphones for younger users, like the popular Sidekick line, which 
T-Mobile recently said it would revive.

AT&T is expected to honor contracts through their expirations, but it is 
unclear what will happen once those contracts expire.

“The prospect of having those kinds of options go away is a real 
concern,” said Mr. Reynolds of Consumer Reports. “It’s a welcome 
offering for people in this market that can be quite unaffordable 
otherwise.”

If approved, the merger is expected to save both companies $3 billion 
annually. That saving, Mr. Sharma said, along with the influx of 
millions of new consumers, might persuade the company to be more 
competitive in family data plans as a way to draw in new subscribers and 
increase competition with Verizon, the new company’s chief rival. If the 
merger is approved, AT&T would have about 129 million wireless customers 
and Verizon about 101 million. Sprint has about 50 million customers.

Another potential byproduct could be a drop in pricing for sleek, 
high-end smartphones. Hardware makers, for example, might offer AT&T a 
lower rate for bulk purchases of new smartphones and tablet computers.

“AT&T’s new scale would give them pricing advantage,” Mr. Sharma said. 
“You could end up seeing $100 or $150 smartphones for consumers in the 
future.” A typical smartphone can cost $200 with a contract. One 
constant in a consumer’s life could remain: frustrating experiences with 
customer service.

“In terms of customer satisfaction, AT&T was clearly in last place, 
below average in comparison to other carriers, including T-Mobile,” he said.

Although T-Mobile has historically performed well in the annual surveys 
conducted by Consumer Reports that rate satisfaction, in big takeovers 
the larger company typically tends to swallow the smaller one, he said.

“The overall consumer experience might become more like AT&T than 
T-Mobile,” Mr. Sharma said.

_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to