Drones’ Suicidal Cousins Lead Libya Attack

By Noah Shachtman
Wired.com

March 21, 2011  | 6:01 pm

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/03/drones-suicidal-cousins/


When the U.S. military wanted to take out Moammar Gadhafi’s air defense 
systems, it unleashed a barrage of 122 Tomahawk cruise missiles. But 
these munitions aren’t like most others in the American arsenal.

Smart, maneuverable, able to see its surroundings and shift to new 
targets in mid-flight, the newest Tomahawks are closer to the unmanned 
planes flying over Afghanistan than to the weapons they fire. In some 
ways, the Tomahawk is the drone’s suicidal cousin: a robotic aircraft, 
packed with explosives, that has no intention of ever coming home.

When officers get ready to shoot off a Tomahawk, “they are basically 
planning a flight for a little airplane,” one Navy official tells Danger 
Room. “It’s got stubby little wings — but is is an unmanned aerial vehicle.”

The next-gen Tomahawks — known as “Block IVs” — start their flights out 
just like other missiles, launched from ships or subs. But after 12 
seconds of flight, things change. The Tomahawk starts to fly 
horizontally, skimming above the ocean at a height of less than 50 feet 
to avoid enemy radar.

GPS waypoints keep the missile on track, until it makes landfall. Then, 
a Tercom (Terrain Contour Matching) system kicks in. too. Using a radar 
altimeter, the Tomahawk Tercom checks its height. Then it matches that 
altitude against a database of satellite and overhead imagery, to make 
sure the missile is headed in the right direction and at the right height.

Once the Tomahawk’s target is in sight, the missile can dart in for the 
attack. A Digital Scene-Mapping Area Correlator (“dee-smack” in military 
jargon) matches a stored picture of the target to the missile’s last 
sight, to make sure the two match.

Or, the missile can wait a while. The Tomahawk’s controller can give it 
a new route, telling the Tomahawk to circle around in the air, lingering 
until an enemy pops up its head. Then comes the strike.

Last May, the Tomahawk demonstrated a new move, as Sam LaGrone from 
Jane’s Defence Weekly reported at the time. The Los Angeles-class 
submarine USS Cheyenne fired off a Block IV at a target in the Mojave 
Desert.

Meanwhile, a team from Naval Special Warfare Group 3 shot a second set 
of co-ordinates to the Tomahawk’s controllers in Japan, nearly 5,000 
miles away. They reprogrammed the missile via satellite, and sent the 
Tomahawk crashing into a new target. (In an earlier test (.pdf), special 
operations forces were able to use the pictures taken from a handheld 
Raven drone to direct its bigger, more destructive relative to its end.)

Cruise missiles have been around in one form or another since World War 
II, and Tomahawks have been schwacking American enemies since the days 
of Desert Storm. Some earlier models had nuclear warheads. Others (still 
in service) employ cluster-bombs, much to the chagrin of human rights 
groups, who hate how the minimunitions can linger on a battlefield long 
after a war is over.

 From the outside, the Block IVs look much like their predecessors: a 
little over 20 feet long, and about 3,300 pounds. Like the older models, 
they’re still expensive, too — at about $1.1 million a pop, the initial 
assault on Libya chewed through $134 million in missile costs alone. 
They can fly for about two hours or 1,000 miles, whichever comes first.

But that could radically change, if an experimental Air Force program 
pans out. The X-51a aircraft is designed to test technologies for a 
next-gen cruise missile — one that would fly at six times the speed of 
sound.

Which means tomorrow’s cruise missiles could be like suicidal, smart, 
and more than eight times faster than today’s Tomahawks.

-- 
=================================================
George Antunes          Voice (713) 743-3923
Associate Professor     Fax   (713) 743-3927
Political Science       Mail: antunes at uh dot edu
University of Houston
Houston, TX 77204-3011

_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to