Motorola Apparently Not Satisfied With Android
http://www.informationweek.com/news/personal-tech/tablets/showArticle.jh
tml?articleID=229400147&cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All

Between the dwindling opportunities for hardware differentiation in the
smartphone and tablet markets, and the Windows-like commoditizing effect
that Android is having across mobile device makers, Motorola Mobility
(like its competitors) have few options but to build their own user
experiences.

By David Berlind InformationWeek
March 23, 2011 12:24 PM

Apparently, Android might not be good enough for Motorola Mobility. At
least not as it comes in its plain vanilla form.

Based on my colleague Tom Claburn's report in InformationWeek
speculating that Motorola Mobility is developing its own mobile Web
operating system, Motorola is sending a pretty clear signal to Google
and the market that it will need its own secret sauce if it's going to
successfully compete against the likes of Samsung, Acer, HTC, and a slew
of other hardware manufacturers who together are essentially
commoditizing Android. As more manufacturers come to market with Android
devices with the same basic chipsets, multi-touch displays, camera, and
audio configurations, the opportunities for hardware differentiation are
rapidly dwindling. So, where else is there to turn but the software?

As Claburn reports, Motorola Mobility has been quietly assembling its
own dream team whose pedigree lies in operating system development.
Wrote Claburn: "Over the past nine months, Motorola Mobility has been
hiring engineering talent that would well-suited to create a new mobile
operating system. Its team appears to include a significant number of
ex-Apple and Adobe personnel, including Gilles Drieu, VP of software
engineering at Motorola Mobility, Benoit Marchant, director of
engineering at Motorola Mobility, and Sean Kranzberg, also a director of
engineering at Motorola Mobility."

So far, Motorola Mobility hasn't confirmed or denied its plans to
InformationWeek, but has said that it remains "committed to Android as
operating system." Claburn cites one analyst -- Deutsche Bank's Jonathan
Goldberg -- as saying that he heard the new Moto OS rumors as well. My
colleague Fritz Nelson is at the CTIA telecommunications conference this
week and, among other things, is trying to find more insiders to
comment.

The question is, what exactly is Motorola up to? Here at
InformationWeek, we've narrowed the news down to two possible outcomes.
The first is, as Claburn suggests, that Motorola plans to develop its
own Web-friendly mobile operating system. There is another option
though. Motorola Mobility could very well stay committed to Android
while at the same time differentiating its Android-based devices by
developing its own user interface.

If Motorola Mobility developed its own user experience layer to run on
top of Android, it wouldn't be the first time that a mobile device maker
looked to differentiate its hardware through a proprietary user
interface. From CTIA yesterday, Nelson filed a video report showing a 3D
interface that HTC has added to Samsung's newest EVOs. HTC has also been
outfitting its Android devices with HTC Sense -- a user experience
technology designed to put "people at the center by making phones work
in a more simple and natural way," according to a HTC press release from
last year. Additionally, Samsung has developed a drag-n-drop user
experience layer for personalizing Android devices called TouchWiz.

But, were Motorola Mobility to hedge its bets by developing its own full
blown OS, the company wouldn't be without its justifications. According
to Nelson, who has been testing an Android-based Motorola Xoom (that
runs the latest Android 3.0 aka "Honeycomb" operating system), there are
problems with the tablet. The biggest of these is that apps -- at least
the ones he has been using -- routinely crash. Furthermore, third
parties in the software development community have been critical of the
Xoom's HTML5 support.

In a blog post last month, Sencha's Aditya Bansod concluded that "The
Xoom browser is not ready for prime-time -- even for HTML4 -- and it
urgently needs a patch update if Motorola wants the product to succeed."

Later in the post, Bansod went on to say: "We were excited about the
first true Android operating system for tablets and had high hopes for a
mobile browser that was as powerful as the platform. Sadly, the Xoom and
Honeycomb are a real disappointment. We found consistent and
reproducible issues in CSS3 Animations and CSS3 Transitions among other
things. We had issues where the browser either hung or crashed. Regular
scrolling was slow or below full frame rate. We had issues where media
playback failed or performed incorrectly. At times it felt like we were
using a pre-production device, but we bought our test device from a
Verizon Wireless store."

Nelson also says that the Xoom's browsing experience leaves much to be
desired. For example, compared to an iPad, the Xoom has major problems
displaying colors accurately when browsing Web pages.

If Motorola were to develop its own operating system, it wouldn't be
alone in playing both sides of the fence, either. Samsung, for example,
has abandoned Windows Mobile in favor of Android. It also has the open
source-based Bada operating system in its stable. Bada is used
internationally, but hasn't surfaced in a domestic U.S. device yet.
Additionally, HP is in the market with its own WebOS (which came with
the Palm acquisition) and, at the same time, HP CEO Leo Apotheker said
he remains committed to launching mobile devices based on an
ARM-compliant version of Microsoft's Windows.

In either case (building a new mobile OS, or a proprietary UI for
Android), Motorola Mobility's incredibly deep ties with the wireless
carriers could lead to a UI that better exposes the plethora of services
that those carriers are desperately trying to use as both
differentiators and upsell opportunities to drive additional ARPU
(average revenue per user).
_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to