June 13, 2011

How Much Will it Cost LightSquared to Fix GPS Interference Problems?

By Gary Kim
Satellite Spotlight Contributing Editor

http://satellite.tmcnet.com/topics/satellite/articles/185422-how-much-will-it-cost-lightsquared-fix-gps.htm


Sometime on June 15, 2011, we will find out what LightSquared (News - Alert)
engineers believe must be done to comply with non-interference rules that
the Federal Communications Commission says must be complied with, before
LightSquared will be permitted to start building its terrestrial Long Term
Evolution network.

In all likelihood, the report will say that filtering techniques are
available that will solve the problem of interference with GPS receivers.
But the big issue will be the cost of doing so. LightSquared expects to
operate as a wholesale provider of LTE (News - Alert) capacity, so the cost
of its network, and the speed with which it can be built, have always been
concerns, especially as rivals accelerate their own LTE network builds.

FCC (News - Alert) Chairman Julius Genachowski has stated, obviously, that
the FCC will not allow LightSquared to launch commercially until GPS
interference concerns are resolved.

Separately, two House Transportation and Infrastructure subcommittees will
conduct an oversight hearing June 23 to discuss potential impacts on U.S.
aviation safety in light of pending government action that may affect GPS
reliability.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is considering an application to
build out nationwide broadband Internet infrastructure, which would allow
high-power Internet broadcast stations to be built across the country
broadcasting on the spectrum neighboring the low-powered GPS signal,
according to a June 10 government advisory.

Genachowski’s June statement effectively rescinds the FCC’s January 2011
waiver to LightSquared for operation of its network on the L band, which is
adjacent to the spectrum reserved for GPS. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA)
began raising spectrum interference concerns this past April.

Initial testing of GPS receivers confirms aircraft navigation systems will
experience significant jamming from thousands of broadband-wireless
transmitters planned to be deployed across the United States.  The tests
were conducted to determine the susceptibility of GPS receivers to
interference from the high-power terrestrial transmitters LightSquared plans
to deploy.

All GPS receivers tested by the National Position, Navigation and Timing
Engineering Forum (NPEF) were affected by the high-power transmissions,
FAA’s Deane Bunce, NPEF co-chair, told a meeting in Washington.

The Senate and House also expressed GPS interference concerns in bipartisan
letters to the FCC. In May, 34 senators signed a letter to the FCC, which
was similar in content to the letter sent later in the month by 66 House
members (49 Republicans and 17 Democrats), which stated, “We request that
the Commission only approve LightSquared’s waiver if it can be indisputably
proven that there will be no GPS interference.”

The FCC granted its integrated-service rule waiver this past January for
LightSquared to operate a terrestrial-only LTE network on the L-band
satellite spectrum. The company acknowledged at the time that its LTE
network might interfere with GPS signals, but assured the interference could
be addressed satisfactorily with technological fixes.

In a recent interview, Nigel Wright, vice president of wireless for testing
and measurement company Spirent (News - Alert), said that the working group
will most likely identify some kind of filter that prevent GPS interference
or bring it down to manageable levels. The question is how expensive such a
filter or other fix would be, Wright said.

In principle, what LightSquared needs are more-effective band-stop filters
that will attenuate radio frequency energy from bleeding beyond the
authorized bounds of the LightSquared bands. Engineers know how to build
such filters. The only issue is what custom filters of this type will cost.
_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to