September 7, 2011

Operator Seeks to Block British Telecom Collaboration
By KEVIN J. O’BRIEN
NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/08/business/global/three-uk-seeks-to-block-british-telecom-collaboration.html


The mobile phone provider Three U.K. on Wednesday asked the European 
Commission to block a joint venture of Britain’s three largest operators 
to sell a common mobile payment and advertising platform for retailers, 
arguing that the companies’ influence in the market would result in high 
fees for consumers.

Stephen Lerner, the regulatory affairs director of Three U.K., said he 
had traveled to Brussels to deliver a letter of concern to European 
competition authorities, asking them to thwart the venture, a combined 
effort by Telefónica of Spain, which runs the O2 service in Britain, 
Vodafone and Everything Everywhere, the No. 1 operator owned by Deutsche 
Telekom and France Télécom.

“Instead of competing for the benefit of consumers, the three operators 
that hold 90 percent of the U.K. market have engaged in a cozy 
collaboration and closed ranks against competition,” Mr. Lerner said.

By combining resources and shutting out Three, an aggressive, low-cost 
seller of phone and Internet services, Mr. Lerner said the operators 
would impose high transaction fees on British consumers. He also said 
the venture could set a difficult precedent in Europe, where countries 
are beginning to grapple with the issues raised by national wireless 
payment networks.

“The competition authorities in Brussels should not allow this type 
collaboration to go forward under any circumstances,” Mr. Lerner said. 
“Excluding the maverick raises serious competition concerns.”

Three was Britain’s fourth-largest mobile operator in August, with 6.9 
percent of the country’s subscribers, according to International Data 
Corporation. Everything Everywhere had 38.5 percent of the market; O2 
was second with 30 percent; and Vodafone third with 24.8 percent.

The three operators said on June 16 that they would form a mobile 
commerce venture by the end of this year. In a joint statement, the 
operators on Wednesday disputed Three U.K.’s objections, saying that 
they were already in talks with the European Commission before formally 
applying for approval later this year. Three will only be able to lodge 
a formal complaint when that happens.

The operators said the venture would “dramatically speed up the 
introduction of mobile advertising and payment services” by enabling 
advertisers, retailers, banks and phone companies to offer 
mobile-commerce products and services.

The venture aims to develop a payment system using a technology called 
Near Field Communication, or NFC, which involves the wireless transfer 
of encrypted account and payment information from a mobile handset to a 
retailer’s electronic cash register. Besides setting common technical 
standards for mobile payments, the venture also plans to sell mobile 
advertising and could set the stage for the future of mobile advertising 
in Britain.

The three operators said the services sold by the venture would be open 
to all retailers and operators, including Three U.K., which has about 
five million customers in Britain and is owned by Hutchison Whampoa of 
Hong Kong.

Each of the three operators in the British venture holds an equal stake. 
Together, the operators plan to invest £10 million to £50 million, or 
about $16 million to $80 million, to develop the technology and market 
it to retailers, according to an employee for one of the companies 
involved who was not authorized to speak publicly.

Mobile payment technology, long promoted as a lucrative source of 
revenue for operators, has made inroads in developing countries where 
banks and phone systems are poor, but has yet to catch on in mature markets.

That may be changing, however. In France, the government in 2010 began 
trials of mobile payments for bus and train tickets in Nice and Paris. 
Even Google, the search engine leader, has said it plans to introduce a 
mobile payment service, Google Wallet, in Europe by 2012.

In Britain, most mobile operators and some banks have conducted trials 
of their own mobile payment services, but the fragmented approach has 
discouraged large retailers from making the investments necessary to 
adopt the technology. John Delaney, an analyst with International Data 
Corporation in London, said a common platform that was set up and run by 
the three British operators would accelerate mobile payment in Britain.

“Mobile payment has moved beyond its infancy and is now poised for 
commercial deployment,” Mr. Delaney said. “The benefits of a common 
platform are that it makes it easier and less expensive for retailers to 
adopt and install the systems without having to deal with individual 
operators and conflicting technical standards.”

Everything Everywhere, Telefónica and Vodafone said they all had 
advanced mobile advertising and payment programs under way, and did not 
intentionally exclude their rival.

“It made sense to bring their expertise and experience together to get 
the venture up and running as quickly as possible, before turning to the 
industry for further participation,” the operators said in their statement.

Mr. Lerner said the exclusion was retribution for Three U.K.’s efforts 
to lower consumer calling and Internet prices, as well as its campaign 
to cut the price of interoperator termination charges, which are 
regulated by the government and tend to benefit the larger mobile companies.

Three also lets its customers use Skype, a rival Internet service that 
allows consumers to avoid mobile charges.

Three’s exclusion weakened its “ability to be a competitive force in the 
U.K.,” he said.

-- 
=================================================
George Antunes          Voice (713) 743-3923
Associate Professor     Fax   (713) 743-3927
Political Science       Mail: antunes at uh dot edu
University of Houston
Houston, TX 77204-3011

_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to