US net neutrality rules finalized, in effect November 20

By Nate Anderson
Ars Technica

September 22, 2011

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/us-net-neutrality-rules-finalized-in-effect-november-20.ars


Get ready, America—net neutrality finally comes to the Internet on 
November 20, 2011.

That's the plan, at least. The FCC has just filed its final "open 
Internet" rules with the Federal Register, which will publish them 
tomorrow and make them official. The rules go into effect on November 
20, nearly a year after they were passed over Republican opposition on a 
3-2 vote. (One of the FCC Commissioners who voted against the rules now 
works for Comcast.)

But the plan will likely be derailed by lawsuits. Two, by Verizon and 
MetroPCS, were filed earlier this year but tossed because the rules had 
yet to be finalized. With tomorrow's printing in the Federal Register, 
the litigation floodgates will be thrown open and and complaints about 
the government overstepping its authority can start pouring in.

Those complaints might well meet with success, given how the FCC went 
about the whole process. Rather than reclassifying broadband services in 
such a way that the FCC has clear jurisdiction over them, the agency 
relied instead on its much weaker "ancillary jurisdiction." (The legal 
rationale for this begins on p. 77 of the final rules, and the FCC 
gamely makes a case that it has the proper authority.) As law professor 
James Grimmelmann noted today in our subscriber-only webchat, "The FCC 
is in a real tangle here. I think if they reclassified broadband service 
(long story), they'd have a better shot at getting their rules to stick."

As for the rules, they're the same modest regulations adopted back in 
December. Here's the FCC's own summary:

"First, transparency: fixed and mobile broadband providers must disclose 
the network management practices, performance characteristics, and 
commercial terms of their broadband services. Second, no blocking: fixed 
broadband providers may not block lawful content, applications, 
services, or non-harmful devices; mobile broadband providers may not 
block lawful websites, or block applications that compete with their 
voice or video telephony services. Third, no unreasonable 
discrimination: fixed broadband providers may not unreasonably 
discriminate in transmitting lawful network traffic."

Mobile networks still have broad leeway to discriminate and throttle and 
even block certain apps, though some of the most obviously objectionable 
activities are forbidden.

On the miraculous off-chance that no lawsuits are filed, however, we'll 
have a side of net neutrality lite to accompany Thanksgiving's pumpkin 
pie. But ISPs don't like constraints, no matter how modest, so the 
matter will probably be decided by federal judges.



-- 
=================================================
George Antunes          Voice (713) 743-3923
Associate Professor     Fax   (713) 743-3927
Political Science       Mail: antunes at uh dot edu
University of Houston
Houston, TX 77204-3011

_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to