Second big satellite set to resist re-entry burn-up
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20955-second-big-satellite-set-to-resist-reentry-burnup.html
Even if NASA's 6-tonne UARS satellite does not cause any injury or  
damagewhen it re-enters the Earth's atmosphere today, there is more  
space junk headed our way next month. A defunct German space telescope  
calledROSAT is set to hit the planet at the end of October – and it  
even is more likely than UARS to cause injury or damage in populated  
areas.

No one yet knows where UARS (Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite) will  
fall to earth. Although most of the craft's mass will be reduced to an  
incandescent plasma, some 532 kilograms of it in 26 pieces are  
forecast to survive – including a 150-kilogram instrument mounting.

NASA calculates a 1-in-3200 chance of UARS causing injury or damage.  
But at the end of October or beginning of November, ROSAT – a 2.4- 
tonne X-ray telescope built by the German aerospace lab DLR and  
launched by NASA in 1990 – will re-enter the atmosphere, presenting a  
1 in 2000 chance of injury.

The higher risk stems from the requirements of imaging X-rays in  
space, says DLR spokesperson Andreas Schütz. The spacecraft's mirrors  
had to be heavily shielded from heat that could have wrecked its X-ray  
sensing operations during its eight-year working life. But this means  
those mirrors will be far more likely to survive a fiery re-entry.

Broken mirror, bad luck
On its ROSAT website, DLR estimates that "up to 30 individual debris  
items with a total mass of up to 1.6 tonnes might reach the surface of  
the Earth. The X-ray optical system, with its mirrors and a mechanical  
support structure made of carbon-fibre reinforced composite – or at  
least a part of it – could be the heaviest single component to reach  
the ground."

At the European Space Agency in Darmstadt, Germany, the head of  
thespace debris office, Heiner Klinkrad, agrees that ROSAT's design  
means more of it will hit the surface. "This is indeed because ROSAT  
has a large mirror structure that survives high re-entry  
temperatures," he says.

ROSAT was deactivated in 1999 and its orbit has been decaying since  
then. "ROSAT does not have a propulsion system on board which can be  
used to manoeuvre the satellite to allow a controlled re-entry," says  
space industry lawyer Joanne Wheeler of London-based legal practice  
CMS Cameron McKenna. "And the time and position of ROSAT's re-entry  
cannot be predicted with any precision due to fluctuations in solar  
activity, which affect atmospheric drag."

Solar swelling
US Strategic Command tracks all space objects and the US-government- 
run Aerospace Corporation lists both upcoming and recent re-entries on  
itswebsite. But ROSAT is not yet on the upcoming list because its re- 
entry time is far from certain.

The moment a craft will re-enter is difficult to predict because it is  
determined by two main factors. First, the geometry of the tumbling  
satellite as it enters the upper atmosphere, which acts as a brake.  
Second, the behaviour of the upper atmosphere itself, which grows and  
shrinks with the amount of solar activity, says Hugh Lewis, a space  
debris specialist at the University of Southampton, UK.

"Solar activity causes the atmosphere to expand upwards, causing more  
braking on space objects. The reason UARS is coming back sooner than  
expected is a sudden increase in solar activity. Indeed, we expect to  
see a higher rate of re-entries as we approach the solar maximum in  
2013," he says.

But don't expect it to be raining spaceships – what's coming down is  
partly a legacy of 1990s space-flight activity. "Some of the re- 
entries we see today [with UARS and ROSAT] are a heritage of years  
with high launch rates, which were a factor of two higher than they  
are today," says Klinkrad.

"The trend is towards smaller satellites, with more dedicated  
payloads," he says, rather than "all-in-one" satellite missions on  
giant craft like UARS. That means debris from future missions should  
be smaller.

Greg Williams
[email protected]
[email protected]



_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to