Calif. governor signs compromise on Internet taxes

Sep 23, 2011  7:14 PM (ET)

By MARCUS WOHLSEN
Associated Press

http://apnews.myway.com//article/20110923/D9PUH5NO0.html


SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Gov. Jerry Brown signed legislation Friday that 
postpones new sales taxes rules that would have affected online 
purchases in California, granting more time for traditional and online 
retailers to lobby Congress for a national standard on the high-stakes 
issue.

The bill, crafted as a compromise among Amazon.com, traditional 
retailers and California lawmakers searching for ways to raise revenue, 
delays until at least September 2012 online tax rules that were 
implemented as part of this year's state budget package.

Under the compromise, Amazon will drop a ballot referendum planned for 
next year to overturn the law passed earlier in the summer, a move that 
promised an ugly and expensive campaign fight between online and 
traditional retailers.

"When you get two threats, that gives you an opportunity to find a 
compromise," Brown said after he signed the bill at Gap Inc. offices in 
San Francisco. "Hopefully, (the bill) will set an example for our 
colleagues in Washington that they too can cooperate."

If that effort fails, Amazon has agreed to start collecting sales tax 
from California customers. The budget bill signed previously by Brown 
forced more online retailers to collect the state sales tax effective 
July 1. The move prompted Amazon to cut ties with some 25,000 affiliate 
businesses in California and spend more than $5 million to collect 
signatures for the ballot referendum.

The compromise bill will cost California an estimated $200 million in 
tax revenue during the current fiscal year but helps both sides avoid a 
costly election contest and the possibility of legal challenges. State 
taxing authorities estimate that California loses at least $83 million a 
year in uncollected state and local use tax attributed to Amazon's sales.

Under the deal, the retailing giant will rekindle its relationship with 
its California affiliates and has promised to create at least 10,000 
full-time jobs and hire 25,000 seasonal employees in the state by the 
end of 2015.

At the bill signing, Amazon's vice president of global public policy, 
Paul Misener, said the company would bring $500 million in investment to 
California over the next several years, mainly in the form of massive 
distribution centers.

Misener praised the spirit of compromise he said led to the deal and 
said he was optimistic federal lawmakers could also find a way to 
collaborate, despite partisan gridlock.

"The sales tax issue must be resolved in Congress," he said. "We are 
committed to going to Washington."

When asked how he expected to persuade Congress to unite around a new 
tax policy in an election year, Brown quipped: "When we find an answer 
to that, we're going to solve a lot more problems."

Consumers are required under state law to pay sales tax when they order 
online from companies out of state, but the tax is virtually impossible 
to enforce without the cooperation of the retailers. Customers rarely pay.

Traditional retailers, from Wal-Mart to local business owners, say the 
inability to police taxation on the Internet creates an uneven playing 
field, with online retailers gaining an unfair advantage.

A 1992 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in a case involving a mail-order 
retailer says a business must only collect state tax from customers if 
it has a physical presence in the state where they live, such as a 
retail store. Several states responded by trying to broaden the 
definition of physical presence. At least six states had done so by 2010 
while nine more, including California, launched similar legislative 
attempts this year.

California's version, under the bill signed earlier this summer, imposed 
tax-collection duties on a company if it used marketing affiliates in 
the state to refer customers or if it had sister companies in 
California, such as Amazon's Silicon Valley company that developed the 
Kindle electronic book reader. Internet retailers such as Amazon and 
Overstock.com said that violated the Supreme Court ruling.

Amazon and the California Retailers Association worked out the 
compromise in the final days of the legislative session to postpone the 
tax measure and allow the online and traditional retail lobbies to make 
a unified push in Washington for a national standard.

The compromise also had the blessing of the California Chamber of 
Commerce and traditional retailers such as Barnes & Noble Inc., Best Buy 
Inc., Crate & Barrel, Sears, Target Corp. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc.

"Amazon's concession to finally begin collecting sales tax in California 
is a ground-breaking moment that sends a strong message to Washington 
that it is time to stop giving special treatment to a select few," Bill 
Dombrowski, president of the California Retailers Association, said in a 
statement released by the governor's office. "All retailers deserve the 
chance to compete, grow and create jobs on a level playing field, 
without government picking winners and losers."

_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to