New technologies challenge network TV

More viewer choice means competition strong for ad dollars

By Julie Stauffer
Business Edge, Ontario Edition


Published: 08/04/2005 - Vol. 2, No. 16

http://www.businessedge.ca/article.cfm/newsID/10204.cfm


The traditional network TV model of earning big advertising bucks based on big audiences is becoming obsolete, according to a recent report by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.

Specialty channels, satellite TV, pay-per-view, Internet television and even TV programs for cellphones mean growing competition for viewers and for advertising dollars.

"The age of a few dominant channels, funded by advertising, has long been disappearing and may soon be turned off for good," the report says.

Industry executives disagree, however, and say rumours of the death of network television are greatly exaggerated.

"Every three or four or five years there's a new technology that is going to kill TV, apparently, but it's a pretty strong medium," says Rob Dilworth, vice-president of research for CTV Television.

Television viewing has increased recently, he says, hitting 26.6 hours a week per viewer in 2004. Historically, the figures have hovered between 22 and 24 hours weekly.

However, Garry Foster, Deloitte's Toronto-based director of technology, media and telecommunications, says networks must respond to the emerging trends by broadening their reach to new media channels and formats such as cellular TV and Internet TV.

Another strategy is deepening relationships with consumers by giving them more control. For example, CBS announced recently that it will offer an Internet newscast where viewers can select the type of news they want to watch.

"As the technology improves and the data delivery system improves more, I think you'll see the opportunities for consumers really to start customizing their broadcasting," Foster says.

Many broadcasters are experimenting with interactive TV, which could be as simple as allowing viewers to vote online for their favourite music videos. A more sophisticated example is Bell ExpressVu's coverage of the Canadian Open last year, which allowed subscribers with special interactive receivers to view multiple video streams, change camera angles and get up-to-the-minute statistics.

Foster says that as the technology evolves, viewers could click on a dress featured in a fashion program, get more information about it and even buy it online.

"One of the things that's really going to drive this is going to be better Internet access," he says, "and as far as high-speed Internet, Canada is probably ahead of the curve."

The Deloitte report, Television Networks in the 21st Century: Maintaining Critical Mass in a Fragmenting World, says networks need to lengthen their content lifecycles by creating physical products such as DVDs, or services such as video-on-demand. According to a BBC trial, offering content on demand for seven days after the initial broadcast increased audience size by 50 per cent.

CTV's Dilworth concedes that the explosion of specialty channels that began in the early 1980s has eroded audiences for existing channels. He adds, however, that the erosion halted about four years ago when the rapid addition of channels slowed down.

Barbara Williams, senior vice-president of programming and production for CanWest MediaWorks, says broadcasters still create a unique shared experience, where everyone watches a show such as Survivor and dissects it the next day.

While those so-called "watercooler" shows continue to bring in big audiences, analysts, media buyers and industry executives agree that the traditional network model is changing - and broadcasters and advertisers need to adapt.

"The sky is not falling," says Dilworth, "but it's changing colour."

According to Statistics Canada's 2004 television report, private broadcasters saw an increase of just 0.9 per cent, for a total of $2.1 billion last year. In contrast, pay TV and specialty channels reported a nine-per-cent increase in revenues in 2004.

As consumers gain more choice from specialty channels and pay TV, as well as new technologies such as Internet TV and cellular TV, they are also gaining more control over what they watch and when they watch it.

More than 100 million homes worldwide now buy on-demand films, according to a recent report from the U.K.-based Informa Media Group, generating $4.4 billion US in revenue in 2004.

Meanwhile, personal video recorders are making it easier than ever to record shows and then skip commercials.

"That does keep many of us up at night," admits Sunni Boot, president and CEO of ZenithOptimedia Canada, a major media buyer based in Toronto. Early indicators suggest that PVR owners fast-forward or eliminate between 50 and 70 per cent of commercials.

One response is to make compelling commercials that viewers do not zap. "People don't skip commercials that entertain and inform them in a very engaging way," Boot says.

Williams says research has shown that one of the reasons viewers choose Canadian channels over U.S. ones are Canadian ads, suggesting that people are not desperately trying to avoid ads.

Boot says the four major English Canada networks still garner 50 per cent of prime-time viewing, continuing to make them good advertising venues. "TV as an entertainment and information vehicle is still one of the most powerful vehicles we have."

More and more, however, advertisers are looking to alternatives to the traditional 30-second TV spot, such as integrated advertising or branded entertainment, where commercials become part of the program.

Boot points to the example of RONA Dream House, a TV renovation series that was created by the Canadian hardware chain and features its products exclusively.

As well, when networks develop new programs - such as the Falcon Beach series that will be launched on Global this fall - marketing and sales staff are being involved from the beginning, rather than selling spots once the series is produced.

"If it's done effectively," Williams says, "it's an experience where it's so integrated into the show and so logically there in the show that it goes unnoticed by the viewer in the sense that they don't feel suddenly they're watching a commercial."

While the product placement may not be intrusive, she says, viewers will certainly take note of what trendy clothes the stars are wearing and what trendy cars they are driving.

Advertisers also are turning to other media to sell their products. The Interactive Advertising Bureau and PricewaterhouseCoopers reported in June that Internet advertising was more than $2.8 billion for the first quarter of 2005, a 26-per-cent increase over the first quarter in 2004, making it the highest-reported quarter in nine consecutive quarters of growth.

Advertisers are also creating brief Internet movies, such as BMW's series of short films directed by the likes of Ang Lee and - naturally - featuring BMW vehicles.

Dilworth and Williams are tight-lipped when it comes to specific plans, but they are closely watching developments in Europe and Japan where Internet TV, interactive TV and cellular TV are farther ahead. Both are confident network TV can continue to thrive and attract advertising dollars.

"Advertising on TV is amazingly effective," Dilworth says. "TV has an ability to impact the emotions of people, whereas when you simply read something or hear it, it's a little tougher to get that effect."

But audience fragmentation does mean networks must work harder, Williams says. "We have to be more creative about it, we have to raise the bar on how we reach out and engage our viewers, because it's not automatic any more.

"But I absolutely believe there's a strong future for conventional television amongst all the other entertainment offerings," she says.


================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
antunes at uh dot edu


Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.

_______________________________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]

To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to