What makes a Stealth Show
Flying under the pop-culture radar, these programs help keep their networks 
aloft

By Jim Benson and Ben Grossman
Broadcasting & Cable

11/7/2005

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6281534.html?display=Feature&referral=SUPP



In this story:
Delivering A Consistent Audience
“They Should Pull Their Head Out And Look Around”
Closes In On 360 Episodes



During the TV advertising upfronts last spring, CBS held a press briefing 
early one morning at its Black Rock headquarters in New York. During Leslie 
Moonves’ remarks, an apparently caffeine-deprived TV critic heard the 
network chief mention the comedy Yes, Dear. Suddenly roused, the critic 
piped up: Why had it taken so long for CBS to cancel the show?

Awkward silence. Moonves had just announced that the 20th Century Fox 
Television show was being renewed for 22 episodes beginning this fall.

Fast-forward to the Nov. 7 issue of The New Yorker. Nancy Franklin, 
reviewing My Name Is Earl and Everybody Hates Chris, takes a passing swipe 
at Yes, Dear, calling it “an unpleasant traditional sitcom that has somehow 
chugged along for five years.”

Not to worry. Just a couple of typical days at the coal mine for Yes, Dear, 
a member of the club that no one wants to join but that networks would 
fight to the death to defend. They are the stealth shows of TV: the 
sitcoms, dramas, clip shows and unscripted fare that might raise nary a 
blip on the media’s pop-culture-cool-detecting radar but would cause heart 
attacks in network accounting departments if they met the fate that many 
critics wish on some of them.

Delivering A Consistent Audience
Stealth shows are shunned by Emmy voters, dismissed by critics (though some 
shows, especially dramas, are much better received than others) and ignored 
by assignment editors. But they deliver a consistent audience, longevity 
and the promise of a lucrative backend—which can do wonders to help cushion 
the embarrassment they might cause a network promoting itself as the home 
of quality programming.

In other words, stealth shows like Yes, Dear—and ABC’s America’s Funniest 
Home Videos, NBC’s Crossing Jordan and a host of others—somehow chug along 
for years because networks dearly need them.

Not that the network executives show them much love. With promotional 
budgets especially tight these days and increasingly devoted to a handful 
of new shows that networks consider their best bets to succeed, the 
producers of stealth shows are feeling more neglected than ever. Some of 
the frustrated producers, weary of hoping for promotion that never comes, 
are devising ways to court viewers on their own. Network executives plead 
their case by saying that, unlike established series with a solid 
following, new and second-season shows require the lion’s share of 
promotion in order to generate the sort of buzz and viewership that ensures 
their survival.

“They Should Pull Their Head Out And Look Around”
Networks “are wrong-headed in the theory that you only promote the new 
stuff,” says Lance Heflin, executive producer of Fox’s America’s Most 
Wanted. “You see Prison Break or House 20 times in a baseball game. You see 
them to such an extent that, by the time the game is over, I feel like I 
already watched an entire episode of House. The show is great, but c’mon. I 
don’t know who the genius is that figured that out, but they should pull 
their head out and look around. There is room for a lot more promotion of 
other shows.”

A Fox spokesperson, in response, calls AMW a valuable asset that “has an 
incredibly loyal audience that has followed it for 19 seasons and knows 
exactly where and when to find it on the Fox schedule.” Presumably, they 
also know where to find Cops, also on Fox Saturday night and another 
stealthy success.

Of course, neither tireless network promotion nor adoring media coverage 
necessarily translates into success. Fox has plunged lots of capital into 
Arrested Development over the past two years, and the show luxuriates in 
rave reviews and admiring media coverage—a recent Lexis-Nexis search for 
the past 60 days indicates that articles mentioning Arrested Development 
occurred eight times more often than those referring to Yes, Dear. Yet 
Arrested Development, on Monday nights, is on Nielsen life-support, while 
Yes, Dear is pleasing CBS on Wednesdays, building on its Still Standing 
lead-in by 13% in adults 18-49 and posting a 24% bump up in ratings over 
the show it replaced, the now-cancelled midweek edition of 60 Minutes.

Despite those healthy signs, Yes, Dear is not a ratings blockbuster and, 
consequently, did not excite buyers when it went into the syndication 
market last year. 20th Century had to settle for an all-barter deal in 
broadcast syndication and getting $75,000 per episode from the TBS cable 
channel (which famously paid $1 million per episode of Seinfeld). Still, 
Yes, Dear is in syndication, and it makes a profit. A pleasant development 
for an “unpleasant” comedy.

“In television, almost all the media and audience attention goes to the top 
10 shows or to the programs that get great reviews from critics,” says 
Mitch Metcalf, executive VP, program planning and scheduling, NBC 
Entertainment. “Lost in the shuffle are the yeoman-like performers that 
form the backbone of any network schedule.”

Craig Erwich, executive VP of programming for Fox, says his workhorse shows 
succeed because “they challenge themselves to improve every year and are 
constantly striving for innovation.”


Programming executives B&C spoke with offer varying definitions of these 
backbone programs, but they cite many of the same shows in that category:

Fox’s Saturday-night cash cows and reality pioneers America’s Most Wanted 
(premiered in 1988) and Cops (1989), which have remained relatively stable 
in adults 18-49 over the past five years, despite facing their usual 
early-season declines against sports on other networks. In a similar vein: 
ABC’s versatile clip show America’s Funniest Home Videos (1990).

The more recent reality show Fear Factor (2001); NBC’s gross-out hour is 
returning at 8 p.m. ET Tuesdays next month with a revamped format after 
ratings erosion last season in its once-powerful 8 p.m. Monday slot.

UPN’s Friday Night Smackdown (1999), which has drastically improved the 
night for UPN this season with young wrestling fans after performing 
relatively steadily for years on competitive Thursday nights

Comedies such as Fox’s animated King of the Hill (1996) on Sunday nights 
and UPN’s 9 p.m. ET Monday entry Girlfriends (2000)

Crime dramas: CBS’ procedural Cold Case (2003) and NBC’s forensic 
investigative series Crossing Jordan (2001), both facing the thankless task 
of airing during ABC’s Sunday-night juggernaut (as does The WB’s bewitching 
Charmed, which has been on the air since 1998). Another stealthily 
successful crime drama: NBC’s Las Vegas (2003), posting solid numbers 
(averaging a 4.6 rating/11 share in adults 18-49 this season, an uptick 
from last year) on Monday nights at 9 p.m. ET.


Kelly Kahl, CBS/UPN executive VP, scheduling and program planning, says 
that Cold Case “never has a bad week,” pointing to its 3.7 average this 
season in adults 18-49—a three-year high for the show, despite consistent 
delays from football doubleheaders. And yet the show has not engendered 
much media interest, Kahl says, probably because the bounty of procedural 
dramas on CBS means that the shows “tend to get lumped together by the press.”

Even without the buzz, Madison Avenue has warmed to Cold Case. According to 
industry estimates, a 30-second spot on Cold Case costs north of $130,000, 
which is about 10% higher than a spot on the competing, higher-profile West 
Wing on NBC. A sure sign of Cold Case’s strength, despite the buzz deficit: 
TNT paid $1.4 million per episode to start syndicating it this season (not 
long ago, A&E paid a little over $1 million per episode for CSI: Miami).

Kahl calls UPN’s Girlfriends “year-in, year-out, the Rodney Dangerfield” of 
sitcoms. Respectable female demos at 9 on tough Monday nights and an 18% 
year-to-year climb from 1.7 to 2.0 in adults 18-34 during the first five 
weeks of this season help make Girlfriends, according to Kahl, “one of the 
few UPN success stories”—but not a story you’re necessarily likely to 
encounter in the press.

The WB Entertainment President David Janollari singles out Charmed as his 
network’s “workhorse.” The show with the loyal fan base has “set ratings 
records in every one of the three time periods it’s been in during its 
long, successful run,” he says. Somehow, the show survived its 1999 
appearance in Newsweek, which posted the worst-possible night of 
programming in an article called “So Much Bad TV, So Little Time.” The show 
must have a charmed existence: Half a dozen years later, it’s still on the 
air, although this fall it has suffered a ratings drop of 18% in adults 18-34.

Faced with media indifference and what they perceive as networks taking 
them for granted, producers of stealth shows are more inclined than ever to 
air their grievances.

Gary Scott Thompson, executive producer of NBC’s 9 p.m. Monday 
under-the-radar series Las Vegas, has been alarmed by the network’s huge 
marketing effort behind launching new shows, such as My Name Is Earl.

“You are trying to program an entire network—and not just a half-hour a 
week,” Thompson says. “Shoving everything into Earl is not going to save 
your network.” In fairness, it should be noted that networks today are just 
copying the tactic of ABC last year, when the network indeed reversed its 
fortunes with its Hail Mary promotional bet on Desperate Housewives and Lost.

And the lopsided deployment might have unintended side effects, Thompson 
says. “It absolutely hurts us in the after-market. But it also hurt what we 
could have done this past season with Raymond [Las Vegas’ former time- slot 
competition] going off the air. We could have really re-launched the thing.”

Thompson says he is baffled because he is not the only one losing potential 
income on the show.

“This is an NBC Studios show. They own the thing,” he says. “Every 
showrunner bitches” about network neglect, he says, “but you would think, 
given that they do own this, they would want to be behind it.” (NBC did not 
return calls for comment.)

At America’s Most Wanted, Heflin and his staff resolved to drum up 
attention for the show on their own.

“A guy who used to be a warden at Folsom Prison once showed me the tools 
the prisoners had made on their own,” Heflin says. “He said the more we 
take away from these guys, the more creative they become. We always thought 
that was the Fox attitude toward us when it comes to promotion.”

One of Heflin’s tactics: using the show’s Web site to get the show noticed. 
Taking over the site about a year ago, Heflin and his team have invested in 
it, featuring letters and stories that did not make it on-air. Web traffic 
in that time has grown from 2 million hits a month to 20 million. 
“Hopefully, they will spread the word and become our marketers and bring 
more viewers to the show,” he says.

Emerging content-delivery technologies such as DVD, wireless and, 
eventually, video-on-demand could also be used to grow AMW, Heflin says. 
“People may not want to watch a whole program, but people may be interested 
in a specific investigation. We could provide a smaller amount of 
information streamed through handheld. That could be big for us.”

AFV Closes In On 360 Episodes
America’s Funniest Home Videos is a classic case of TV stealthiness. The 
show was an enormous hit when it premiered 15 years ago with what was 
considered, at the time, the innovative premise of having viewers send in 
their video of everyday comic moments in their lives. That might seem 
antiquated now, but the formula created by executive producer Vin Di Bona 
still works.

AFV is up 21% this season versus a year ago in adults 18-49 (from a 2.4 to 
a 2.9 rating), despite having been largely ignored for years by the press 
and the network’s promotion engine. But ABC certainly recognizes the 
property’s importance: It leads off the network’s valuable Sunday nights. A 
30-second spot on AFV fetches a modest $86,302, but that’s still 34% more 
than the cost of a spot on the competition at NBC’s Dateline.

The 8 p.m. ET Sunday hit Extreme Makeover: Home Edition has garnered higher 
ratings when it has aired in the AFV slot, but ABC Entertainment Executive 
VP Jeff Bader, who heads scheduling and strategy, couldn’t be happier with 
AFV’s performance.

Since its inception, the show has aired as both a regular series and 
specials ranging from 30 minutes to two hours, and it hasaired in 10-20 
different time periods (accounts vary) on five different nights of the 
week. Bader points out that, at the end of this season, ABC will have aired 
more than 360 episodes of AFV—supplanting The Lawrence Welk Show as ABC’s 
most prolific series.

Debuting the same night as The Simpsons in January 1990—back when there 
were only 3½ broadcast networks and cable wasn’t much of a factor—AFV 
finished its first season averaging a 21.1 household rating.

Says Bader, “Take that, American Idol.”


================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
antunes at uh dot edu



Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to