Swedes Go High-Tech to Crack Stradivari Code

By Guy Gugliotta
Washington Post Staff Writer

Monday, February 6, 2006; A06

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/05/AR2006020500792_pf.html


Paganini had two of them. Heifetz owned "Dolphin," perhaps the best of the 
best. Itzhak Perlman bought "Soil" from Yehudi Menuhin for $1.25 million, 
and probably got a bargain. Christie's sold "Lady Tennant" at public 
auction last year for $2 million, and private owners have gotten more than 
twice as much in closed deals.

Nearly 270 years after his death, the genius of violin-maker Antonio 
Stradivari shines brightly as ever. So elegant do his violins sound, so 
easily do they play and so beautiful are they to behold that most of the 
650 or so that survive are famous enough to have their own names.

Today, Stradivari's instruments are still coveted by great virtuosi, but 
even as their music has captivated generations of concertgoers, their 
workmanship has confounded generations of scientists and artisans. Why does 
a Stradivarius sound the way it does? Why has no one ever been able to 
duplicate it?

Over the years experts in disciplines ranging from carpentry to historical 
climatology have explored the phenomenon, bringing provocative insights to 
the debate but finding no definitive model that a craftsman could take to 
the workshop.

Into this quest a Swedish team has suggested something different: Instead 
of trying to build a duplicate Stradivarius part by part, why not start 
with a computer model of a whole violin, tinker with it electronically 
until its sound matches a Stradivarius -- and then build it?

"The violin is easy to measure geometrically," said structural engineer 
Mats Tinnsten in a telephone interview from Mid Sweden University. "Then 
you can measure how it vibrates, look at the frequencies and other 
parameters. You excite it with a loudspeaker, knock on it with your 
knuckles. We can do this as well."

But after that it gets tricky. Violins are made of wood, and no two pieces 
of wood are exactly alike. Each violin, whether built by Stradivari or 
Tinnsten, is unique, and the challenge is to sculpt the wood -- delicately 
shaving the top and the back -- to "optimize" the acoustical qualities. 
Stradivari, working in a pre-industrial age, did this by ear and hand with 
unsurpassed consistency and artistry.

Tinnsten said his team can do it, too. "Violin-makers reduce the thickness 
of the wood with a knife, and do it in different places until they are 
satisfied," he said. "We use the same method, but in the computer. We take 
an electronic blank and carve it."

Having devised the program, the Swedish team's next task is to prove that 
it works. It proposed building a violin with two tops. Carve one top, 
install it, and measure and calibrate the sound of the resulting 
instrument. Then load these parameters into the computer and carve a 
different piece of wood so as to duplicate the sound produced by the first.

This project is not yet underway, Tinnsten said, "but all we lack is time." 
If, and only if, the two-tops experiment succeeds, will the team ask for 
the privilege of measuring and, perhaps, duplicating an actual Stradivarius.

The Swedish research, first presented last summer at the International 
Congress on Sound and Vibration, offers a new and welcome wrinkle on the 
Stradivari puzzle, said violin expert Thomas Sparks, director of string 
instrument technology at Indiana University's Jacobs School of Music.

"Any time somebody does acoustical research, they really refine some of the 
earlier theories of why these instruments work the way they do," Sparks 
said in a telephone interview. But acoustics isn't the whole story, he 
added. "It's about the whole box."

Stradivari, better known by the Latinized version of his name, 
Stradivarius, learned his trade from the Amati family of Cremona, near 
Milan. Beginning with the Amatis, continuing with Stradivari and finishing 
with Giuseppe Guarneri del Gesu, the Cremonese instrument-makers dominated 
the violin trade from around 1560 to 1750.

Stradivari, who was born in 1644 and died in 1737, was perhaps the most 
fascinating of the maestri. The Amatis, Sparks said, "knew how to teach 
violin-making," while Guarneri was a tinkerer and a genius "who made a 
dozen violins that could outplay any Strad," but he couldn't manage it on a 
regular basis.

"Stradivari is the most consistent artist, with good sound, good looks and 
good coloration," Sparks said. "Stradivari could consciously alter an 
instrument to obtain a desired result. I believe if you knocked on his door 
today, he could tell you exactly how he did it."

But no one else can. Early in the post-Cremona world, craftsmen tried 
without success to duplicate the Stradivari sound by building violins to 
the master's exact dimensions. In the 19th century, restorers strengthened 
the Stradivari instruments by enlarging the bass bars and sound posts. The 
violins sounded even better, but, still, nobody could clone them.

More recently research has focused on the wood -- soft spruce on the top 
plate and hardwood maple on the back plate and sides. The spruce vibrates, 
while the maple propels the sound up and out. The effect is like that of a 
kettle drum.

The key, some scientists have suggested, is that Stradivari used alpine 
spruce during a climatic era of uncommonly cold weather. Annual growth 
rings were close together, making the wood abnormally dense. Others have 
focused on the varnish, suggesting that it stiffened the wood.

Sparks, a violin-maker in his own right and an expert on the Cremona 
craftsmen, has noted that the woods Stradivari used were almost devoid of 
sugars, saps, resins and other organics, leaving only fiber and lignum, the 
"glue" that holds the fiber together.

"Think of it as similar to mummification," Sparks said. "Added weight 
retards sound, so you want the structure to be lightweight with high fiber 
density, and these older instruments are 20 percent lighter than modern 
wood -- and it's not because of age."

If a special curing process is the answer, the Swedish experiment could be 
doomed before it takes place, because the raw material will require an 
as-yet-unknown pre-treatment. If curing is not the answer, though, then 
Sweden, with an ample supply of cold-weather trees, "should be able to 
produce a pretty good violin," Tinnsten said.

Prospects for resolving the mystery should improve, because a lot of people 
are working on it, and "there isn't anything hidden," Sparks said. But, he 
added, it will take time, because "you can't find all the information in 
one spot."

When the Italian economy nosedived in the late 18th century, the Cremonese 
violin-makers went out of business, Sparks explained. Craft guild records 
and family histories were squirreled away in multiple archives, confounding 
the efforts of both violin-makers and scientists to unearth them.

"At this point," Sparks said, "the search is like archaeology."


=================================================
George Antunes                    Voice (713) 743-3923
Associate Professor               Fax   (713) 743-3927
Political Science                    Internet: antunes at uh dot edu
University of Houston
Houston, TX 77204-3011         



Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to