AT&T Seeks to Hide Spy Docs

By Ryan Singel
Wired News

11:00 AM Apr, 12, 2006

http://www.wired.com/news/technology/1,70650-0.html


AT&T is seeking the return of technical documents presented in a lawsuit 
that allegedly detail how the telecom giant helped the government set up a 
massive internet wiretap operation in its San Francisco facilities.

In papers filed late Monday, AT&T argued that confidential technical 
documents provided by an ex-AT&T technician to the Electronic Frontier 
Foundation shouldn't be used as evidence in the case and should be returned.

The documents, which the EFF filed under a temporary seal last Wednesday, 
purportedly detail how AT&T diverts internet traffic to the National 
Security Agency via a secret room in San Francisco and allege that such 
rooms exist in other AT&T switching centers.

The EFF filed the class-action lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Northern 
California in January, seeking damages from AT&T on behalf of AT&T 
customers for alleged violation of state and federal laws.

Mark Klein, a former technician who worked for AT&T for 22 years, provided 
three technical documents, totaling 140 pages, to the EFF and to The New 
York Times, which first reported last December that the Bush administration 
was eavesdropping on citizens' phone calls without obtaining warrants.

Klein issued a detailed public statement last week, saying he came forward 
because he believes the government's extrajudicial spying extended beyond 
wiretapping of phone calls between Americans and a party with suspected 
ties to terrorists, and included wholesale monitoring of the nation's 
internet communications.

AT&T built a secret room in its San Francisco switching station that 
funnels internet traffic data from AT&T Worldnet dialup customers and 
traffic from AT&T's massive internet backbone to the NSA, according to a 
statement from Klein.

Klein's duties included connecting new fiber-optic circuits to that room, 
which housed data-mining equipment built by a company called Narus, 
according to his statement.

Narus' promotional materials boast that its equipment can scan billions of 
bits of internet traffic per second, including analyzing the contents of 
e-mails and e-mail attachments and even allowing playback of internet phone 
calls.

While AT&T's open filings did not confirm the details of Klein's statement, 
they did not dispute the legitimacy of his claims, and the company's filing 
included a sealed affidavit attesting to the sensitivity of the documents.

The company asked for a hearing Thursday to determine whether the documents 
could be used in the class-action lawsuit, whether they would be unsealed 
or whether the EFF would have to return them. The EFF filed a rebuttal, 
calling that time frame unworkable and accusing AT&T of not following 
normal court rules.

AT&T's lawyers also told the court that intense press coverage surrounding 
the case, including Wired News' publication of Klein's statement, was 
revealing the company's trade secrets, "causing grave injury to AT&T." The 
lawyers argued that unsealing the documents "would cause AT&T great harm 
and potentially jeopardize AT&T's network, making it vulnerable to hackers, 
and worse."

The EFF filed the documents last week under a temporary seal when it asked 
the judge to force AT&T to stop the alleged internet spying until the case 
goes to trial.

Klein's statement and documents are the only direct evidence filed so far 
by the EFF, and without them its case could be weakened.

It is not clear whether AT&T has served legal papers to Klein.

As of last week, Klein was represented by Miles Ehrlich, who until January 
served as a U.S. attorney in San Francisco, prosecuting white-collar crime. 
Klein is now also represented by two lawyers from the powerhouse law firm 
Morrison & Foerster, including James J. Brosnahan, who is best known for 
representing John Walker Lindh, the Marin County, California, man found 
fighting for the Taliban in Afghanistan.

The EFF declined to comment on the filing, while AT&T did not return a call 
seeking comment. The case is Hepting v. AT&T.


================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
antunes at uh dot edu



Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to