New Sites That Make Old Functions Easy

By Rob Pegoraro
Washington Post

Sunday, June 25, 2006; F05

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/24/AR2006062400070_pf.html


If you grind away in Microsoft Office for a living, the idea of a 
spreadsheet, word processor, photo editor or calendar that exists only as 
code on a Web page might seem ridiculous.

But Office jockeys aren't the market for a new sort of Web-based 
application offered by both Internet heavyweights like Google and obscure 
start-ups -- all hoping to draw an audience among people who might 
otherwise buy a copy of Microsoft's ubiquitous suite or another traditional 
program.

These new sites -- can we call them programs, too? -- offer a subset of the 
popular functions of traditional, disk-bound packages while not requiring 
you to install any software beyond a modern Web browser, or fuss with any 
funky browser plug-ins. Most don't even cost anything to use.

For all the high-end features they leave out, these sites can work quite 
well -- even implausibly so.

These Web-based programs' biggest disadvantage may be that aspect alone -- 
the "too good to be true" reaction caused by seeing a Web page turn into a 
live spreadsheet. It doesn't help that the entire concept of Web software 
has been discredited so many times by earlier attempts that relied on 
extra, often glitch-prone software running inside our browsers.

What's happening now has little to do with what flopped before. Instead of 
asking you to wait for an ActiveX, Java or Flash component to fire up in 
your browser (or just crash it), this crop of Web applications -- for 
example, Google's Calendar and Spreadsheet, as well as Tabblo's self-titled 
photo-album site and Ajax13's AjaxWrite -- runs on standard Web code and 
scripting languages.

Because of that, all you need are a copy of Mozilla Firefox (Internet 
Explorer for Windows is accepted at almost all of these sites; Apple's 
Safari is welcome at some, too) and an Internet connection, preferably 
broadband. You can run Windows, you can use a Mac, you can run Linux; all 
will do fine.

These sites load only a little slower than regular Web pages but present 
interfaces like those of traditional software: toolbars, menus, 
drag-and-drop editing, keyboard-shortcut commands and so on. Clicking on 
any of these elements doesn't require waiting for the page to reload; 
things happen in real time, just as if you were using code confined to your 
hard drive.

Google Calendar ( http://calendar.google.com ) is the best-known example in 
this bunch. It looks much like the calendar module in Outlook or any other 
personal info manager but functions with far greater simplicity. To add an 
event, click on the desired time on the right day; to reschedule one, drag 
it to a new date and time.

Like Apple's iCal, Google Calendar can subscribe to published calendars 
online; a built-in search function simplifies finding them. You can also 
share your own calendar with other Web users (or save it as a desktop 
file), then choose whether they can view events on it or edit them, too.

It has its limits -- for instance, you can't set an event to repeat every 
two weeks -- but in general it succeeds. If only it were usable on mobile 
phones' Web browsers; instead, you're limited to having Google send text 
messages to your phone about upcoming events.

Google Spreadsheet ( http://spreadsheet.google.com ) approximates the looks 
of Microsoft Excel and other commercial spreadsheet applications and can 
even open and save Excel files. It ably handles most basic spreadsheet 
chores; Google Spreadsheet seems particularly appropriate for the way home 
users employ spreadsheets as glorified list managers.

It's less adept at involved number crunching, mainly because its help pages 
don't explain what its inscrutable formula codes mean. (What calculation 
will "DB" perform, versus "DBB"?) Printing is a step too complicated as 
well; you have to select "Get HTML" from the File menu, then use your 
browser's "Print" command.

Google Spreadsheet's strongest attribute is the way it lets you share your 
work: Instead of e-mailing a file back and forth, you can invite anybody to 
read or edit your spreadsheet online, then exchange text messages with them 
as you work together on it.

Using either Google Calendar or Spreadsheet requires getting a Google 
account; presumably, once you do so, you'll spend that much more time on 
Google's sites, therefore seeing more of Google's ads.

The desktop application that most closely resembles Tabblo would be Apple's 
iPhoto, or at least the photo-management half of it. The site ( 
http://www.tabblo.com ) lets you construct interactive galleries (that is, 
tableaux -- get it?), including captions.

You can drag pictures from one spot to another, then apply a few special 
effects, such as sepia tones or a nifty "oil paint" look, with clicks of a 
mouse. These creations can be shared online or ordered in printed form (how 
the site aims to make its money).

AjaxWrite ( http://www.ajaxwrite.com ) attempts to bring word processing to 
the Web and does a decent job of it. It can read Microsoft Word and other 
major file formats, but not without missing some formatting details. It's 
also lacking some common tools, such as a word count and a spell check.

AjaxWrite doesn't store your work online to share with others; you must 
download it to your hard drive. That makes this site less versatile than 
the others.

(Google recently bought another word-processing site, Writely, and plans to 
integrate that into the Google fold alongside the likes of Spreadsheet and 
Calendar.)

These sites have the same advantage of older, simpler Web-based 
applications like Web-mail services: There's nothing to install, and 
updates arrive automatically when the Web site revises its own code. And 
your work is saved automatically, though keeping a backup on your computer 
still makes sense.

But it's even more amazing how well these sites, Google's twosome in 
particular, can provide the online sharing and collaboration that offices 
have usually provided through such expensive, high-maintenance "groupware 
solutions" as Lotus Notes or Microsoft's Office server software.

It's too easy to focus on the missing features of these sites and discount 
the possibility of improvement. Betting against the future can be wise when 
it comes to conventional software releases that see updates only every few 
years, but here it doesn't seem so smart.

This kind of software not only has the potential to get better fast, it 
probably will.


================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
antunes at uh dot edu



Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to