Warner Issues Counterbid Of $4.56 Billion for EMI Group

By JESSICA HODGSON and TASKA MANZAROLI
Wall Street Journal

June 28, 2006 5:32 a.m.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115148016148492875.html?mod=home_whats_news_us


LONDON -- EMI Group PLC Wednesday confirmed it had received two recent 
approaches from Warner Music Group, both of which it had rejected, and had 
itself submitted a revised bid for Warner Music Group, which had also been 
turned down.

After trading started on the London Stock Exchange, the U.K.'s EMI 
confirmed a newspaper report that Warner, based in New York, made its 
latest approach Tuesday, valuing the company at around £2.5 billion ($4.56 
billion), or 320 pence a share. EMI said it rejected the bid, which 
followed an earlier bid made on June 14, at 315 pence a share.

In late-morning trading Wednesday, EMI's shares were up 25.25 pence, or 
8.9%, at 309 pence.

Warner's move, first reported in the Financial Times, is the latest in a 
series of takeover proposals and counterproposals made by the two companies 
in recent weeks. EMI said in the statement it had made a revised proposal 
to Warner Music Group, to acquire all its outstanding shares for $31 in 
cash, on June 23.

EMI and Warner have been in periodical discussions since 2000, when they 
backed out of an agreement to merge after it became clear that regulators 
would likely block the deal on antitrust grounds.

EMI, which counts Robbie Williams, Coldplay and Norah Jones among its 
artists, kicked off the current round of negotiations on May 3, when it 
offered Warner Music $28.50 a share, in cash and shares, valuing the 
company at $4.2 billion. Warner Music, whose shareholders include Chairman 
Edgar Bronfman Jr. and private-equity groups Thomas H. Lee & Partners, Bain 
Capital Inc. and Providence Equity, turned the approach down.

Analysts have for some time seen a tie-up between EMI and Warner, whose 
artist roster features Madonna and Green Day, as desirable and inevitable. 
A combination would create a music group with a 25.5% market share, making 
it the world's second-largest music company after Universal Music Group, a 
unit of Vivendi, according to data from the International Federation of the 
Phonographic Industry.

Numis Securities said in a research note Wednesday: "We have long been of 
the view that a merger between EMI and Warner would add very significant 
value," pointing to the estimated £160 million in cost savings the deal 
would create, and the enhanced scale. Numis rates EMI hold.

Analysts at UBS, however, believe the cost synergies realized by a deal 
would be closer to £100 million. UBS has a neutral recommendation on EMI.

Numis drew attention to possible barriers to the deal, which include the 
financial structure, management conflicts and possible antitrust issues.

EMI, which has net debt of £879.5 million, has said it would finance the 
deal from a combination of debt and a rights issue. Two major investors 
told Dow Jones at the time of the first approach they backed a rights issue 
to finance a deal.

Press reports have claimed that both EMI's chairman, Eric Nicoli, and 
Warner Music chairman Bronfman, want to run the company.

It is also unclear whether European Union competition authorities would 
allow the deal. The EU hasn't commented on whether it would allow EMI and 
Warner to merge since the renewed talks began, but in 2004 its competition 
regulator allowed Sony Corp. and Bertelsmann A.G. to combine their music units.

UBS said in a research note Wednesday it believes there is upside to the 
EMI share price, with a fair value target of 270 pence.


=================================================
George Antunes                    Voice (713) 743-3923
Associate Professor               Fax   (713) 743-3927
Political Science                    Internet: antunes at uh dot edu
University of Houston
Houston, TX 77204-3011         



Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to