College Student Tracking Assailed
Opponents Cite Survey Showing Private Schools Oppose Idea

By Lois Romano
Washington Post Staff Writer

Friday, July 7, 2006; A15

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/06/AR2006070601424_pf.html


Private colleges yesterday fired a rather noisy shot across the bow of an 
education proposal aimed at keeping closer tabs on institutions of higher 
learning through a new national database of student records.

"Is there some reason to reverse three decades of [privacy] policy and go 
down this Orwellian road?" asked Christopher B. Nelson, the president of 
St. John's College, during a conference call with reporters to call 
attention to a new survey on the subject.

The controversial concept of a national student "unit" tracking system has 
been floating around for about two years. It was given a boost last month 
when Education Secretary Margaret Spellings's Commission on the Future of 
Higher Education released a draft report endorsing such a plan.

The idea, proponents say, is not to invade the privacy of students, but to 
force colleges to be more accountable to the public by revealing such 
information as accurate enrollment figures and financial aid percentages, 
as well as graduation, transfer and dropout rates. The data would come from 
individual students, but their identities would be protected, supporters say.

Right now, the plan has no legs. The House included in its higher education 
bill a prohibition on such a plan; the Senate bill ignored it; and some 
powerful legislators oppose it. Nonetheless, private institutions are 
fretting that the Department of Education will find a way around Congress 
to implement it.

The National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities yesterday 
released a survey reporting that 62 percent of the respondents oppose a 
federal data-collection effort, with 45 percent strongly against it.

Critics of the survey said that the questions were worded to elicit a 
negative response, and that the association did not tell participants that 
records would be confidential and would likely be encrypted, so that it 
would be virtually impossible to identify a student.

"They're scare-mongering," said Kati Haycock, director of the Education 
Trust, an independent advocacy group. Haycock is also a member of the 
higher education commission.

"I can't think of single con," she said. "The bottom line is that they are 
trying make this about student privacy, and it's about their own 
institutions' privacy."

Proponents, including the Education Department and some public higher 
education institutions, believe such a plan would provide a picture of how 
the nation's young people are being educated. They note that most states 
already keep such data, although there is no national archive. A spokesman 
said the Education Department will wait until the commission's final report 
is issued to comment.

Travis Reindl, director of policy analysis for the American Association of 
State Colleges and Universities, said that a tracking system would "offer 
the opportunity to answer questions that we can't answer right now about 
the types of students we have and how they are learning."

"Right now, when a student leaves school, we have no way of knowing whether 
they went to another institution or several institutions," he said. "We 
lose them along the way and lose the ability to know whether they 
graduated. This not just about accountability. This about helping 
institutions help students."

Still, private school administrators and others do not see it that way. 
They charge that far too much information about individuals could be 
collected and would follow them through their careers.

The United States Student Association views the proposal "as a massive 
invasion of student privacy," according to the group's legislative 
director, Rebecca Thompson.

"It's cradle-to-grave tracking," said Rolf Wegenke, president of the 
Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities. "It can 
easily be connected to other databases and be connected to basic freedoms."


================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
antunes at uh dot edu



Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to