Amnesty accuses US firms over China web censorship
By Ben Blanchard

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060720/wr_nm/rights_china_amnesty_dc_1

BEIJING (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp, Google Inc and Yahoo Inc have 
breached the Universal Declaration on Human Rights in colluding with 
China to censor the Internet, Amnesty International said on Thursday.

The three publicly traded companies are ignoring their own stated 
commitments -- which in Google's case includes corporate motto "Don't be 
evil" -- and are in denial over the human rights implications of their 
actions, the group said.

"All three companies have, in one way or another, facilitated or 
concluded in the practice of censorship in China," London-based Amnesty 
said in a report.

"All three companies have demonstrated a disregard for their own 
internally driven and proclaimed policies. They have made promises ... 
which they failed to uphold in the face of business opportunities and 
pressure from the Chinese government," it said.

"This raises doubts about which statements made by these organizations 
can be trusted and which ones are public relations gestures."

Yahoo defended itself by saying its presence in China, even with the 
restrictions, could still help open up the country and added that it, 
too, was concerned by the issue.

"We believe we can make more of a difference by having even a limited 
presence and growing our influence, than we can by not operating in a 
particular country at all," Yahoo said in a statement to Reuters.

Calls to Google and Microsoft representatives in China were not 
immediately returned.

Amnesty said the three companies were in violation of Article 19 of the 
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which says everyone should be 
guaranteed freedom of expression.

The group said it was calling on the three companies and other Internet 
firms to lobby Beijing to release all "cyber dissidents," be open about 
what filtering policies they operate and promote human rights in China.

Amnesty said some actions the firms had taken, like Google's refusal to 
offer an e-mail service in China due to privacy-invasion worries, were 
good, but more action was needed.

In May, Yahoo said it was seeking the U.S. government's help in urging 
China to allow more media freedom after reports linking information the 
company gave to Chinese authorities with the jailing of a dissident.

The case was the latest to highlight conflicts of profit and principle 
for companies in the world's second-biggest Internet market.

Web search leader Google has come under fire for saying it would block 
politically sensitive terms on its new China site, bowing to conditions 
set by Beijing.

Earlier this month, China sentenced reporter Li Yuanlong to two years in 
jail, adding to its list of writers imprisoned for expressing themselves 
through the country's expanding but tightly censored Internet.


Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to