Cable bundle pricing dings AT&T broadband growth

By Marguerite Reardon
http://news.com.com/Cable+bundle+pricing+dings+AT38T+broadband+growth/2100-1034_3-6098283.html

While AT&T reported second-quarter profits that beat analysts' estimates 
on Tuesday, there's reason to believe that the company's strong 
broadband growth over the past several quarters may be slowing as 
competition from cable operators increases.

For the second quarter of 2006, AT&T signed up 342,000 new DSL 
subscribers. This compares to 511,000 subscribers in the first quarter 
of this year and 425,000 subscribers in the fourth quarter of 2005.

Rick Lindner, chief financial officer of AT&T, said during a conference 
call with analysts on Tuesday that the decline in the number of 
subscribers had been expected, since the second quarter is typically 
slower than other quarters. AT&T's subscriber numbers don't look as 
dismal when compared to the same quarter last year, when the company 
signed up 360,000 new DSL customers.

While seasonality may explain part of the decline, increased competition 
from cable operators offering "triple play" packages of voice, broadband 
and TV service has also likely impacted subscriber growth.

"As cable companies enter specific markets, we do see some impact," 
Lindner admitted. "It's more in the early periods when they first 
introduce service, and then it starts to level off."

About a year ago, AT&T introduced a low promotional price for its DSL 
service--1.5Mbps for $12.99 for the first 12 months of service. The 
promotion has been successful and likely helped the company grow its 
subscriber base rapidly throughout the second half of 2005.

"They captured a lot of the low-hanging fruit when they introduced the 
lower-price service," said Jim Penhune, an analyst at Strategy 
Analytics. "But now cable operators are fighting back with low prices on 
their triple-play bundles."

Comcast, the nation's largest cable company, has been pushing its 
triple-play bundle in some areas of the country for $99 for the first 
year of service.

Lindner admitted that Comcast's success has affected AT&T's business.

"We're seeing some impact from Comcast," he said. "But penetration is 
leveling off."

n the fight for broadband customers, the triple-play bundle is the holy 
grail that many providers believe will keep customers loyal to their 
brand. The idea is that consumers who subscribe to only one service can 
easily switch to another provider, but when they subscribe to two or 
more services, the odds of them switching declines.

Cable operators such as Comcast, Cox Communications and Time Warner 
Cable are way ahead of AT&T in offering such packages. They have been 
selling voice service, in addition to broadband access and TV service, 
for more than a year.

AT&T began offering its U-verse TV service, which is based on Internet 
Protocol television technology, last month. The company is marketing the 
service to only 6,200 customers in San Antonio, 10 percent of which it 
says have already signed up. It plans to expand the offering to select 
customers in 15 to 20 cities by the end of the year, but Lindner 
emphasized that the rollout will be slow.

"We are being patient and rolling out the service in a measured way," he 
said. "We want to ensure the customer experience is good, and we want to 
make word of mouth to be a positive impact on marketing."

In the meantime, AT&T has also launched its Homezone service, which 
integrates satellite TV service from EchoStar Communications with AT&T's 
broadband service, in San Antonio and Ohio. Homezone is being offered in 
areas where AT&T isn't deploying U-verse.

"Homezone is better than what AT&T offers now," Penhune said. "But 
ultimately, they don't want to be reselling anyone's service. That said, 
AT&T doesn't have much choice right now. Rolling out U-verse is going to 
take time, and they need something to compete."


Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to