FCC Lacks Multicast Muscle, says McDowell

By John Eggerton
Broadcasting & Cable

8/8/2006 8:51:00 AM

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6360473.html?display=Breaking+News


New FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell put something of an exclamation point 
on his regulatory independence in a briefing with reporters Tuesday, 
including making it clear he does not think the FCC has the authority to 
mandate multicast must-carry without clearer direction from Congress.

McDowell, who was sworn in June 1, said he was open to separating the 
omnibus FCC ownership review into smaller bites rather than "one big kidney 
stone to pass." He also said he wanted to take a wait-and-see approach to 
the  issue of cable a la carte, saying consumer demand may force a private 
sector solution.

As to multicast must-carry, which like a la carte has been pushed by FCC 
Chairman Kevin Martin, an engaging and at-ease McDowell said he did not 
believe Congress had given the FCC authority to mandate it, saying if 
Congress wanted to give it that express authority it could.

In late May, Martin circulated a proposal to grant multicast must carry, 
but could not get the McDowell vote to approve it.

McDowell also said the FCC was just doing what Congress told them to do by 
regulating indecenct content, saying the Congress had recently put 
additional wind in the commissions sails, referring to the bill to boost 
fines to a maximium $325,000 per incident.

McDowell called "network neutrality" a Rrorschach term (those ink blotches 
psychologist ask patients to interpret), that depends on where you stand. 
Where he stands, he said, is in support of the FCC's four neutrality 
principles and concerned with balancing the need for network management 
with the threat of abuse.

He said it would be tough for the government to apply a prophylactic for a 
problem that does not yet exist, suggesting that the FCC did not want to be 
the French goalie, referring to a World Cup soccer shootout in which that 
goalie, as with most goalies in such shootouts, kept guessing left when the 
ball went right, or vice versa.

He defended the MASN settlement, in which Comcast and the Mid Atlantic 
Sports Network agreed to terms on carriage of Washington Nationals baseball 
games. McDowell had been instrumental in a condition on the Comcast/Time 
Warner Adelphia merger that put that carriage complaint by MASN on a shot 
clock.

He said it was good for consumers and didn't see forcing the hand of 
private negotiations as being in conflict with his philosophy of letting 
the market find its own solutions. He pointed out that when there is market 
failure, the FCC can step in, pointed out the utlimate deal was a private one.

While he did recognize the FCC's role in addressing marketplace failures, 
he said he preferred sunsets on such actions, putting the market on a 
"glide path" back to nongovernmental solutions.

McDowell said he saw two principle issues on the FCC agenda, "threading the 
needle" of the third circuit remand of media ownership rules, and revamping 
the universal service fund, which underwrites telecommunications deployment 
to rural and underserved areas via contributions from industry.

McDowell would not handicap the ownership issue beyond saying he was eager 
to look at the "refreshed" record, but he did say that he was not opposed 
to dividing up the numerous issues involved, which include 
newspaper-broadcast crossownership, multiple station ownership and radio 
ownership caps.


================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
antunes at uh dot edu



Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to