Non-Hijackable Planes Would Trade Privacy For Security
Reuters - eWEEK

http://news.yahoo.com/s/zd/20060811/tc_zd/185892

Can technology create a non-hijackable plane?

By 2008, European researchers aim to bring that vision closer to reality 
through an ambitious security programme to combat on-board threats in an 
industry left reeling this week by a security scare that raised the 
spectre of Sept. 11.

On Thursday, British police said they had foiled a plot to blow up 
aircraft mid-flight between Britain and the United States in what 
Washington said might have been an attempted al Qaeda operation.

Since Sept. 11, the idea that civilian planes can be used as weapons has 
taken hold globally, spawning increased security measures in airports 
around the world.

The researchers aim to create a "last barrier to attacks" on planes in 
flight.

Among the non-hijackable plane's features: computer systems designed to 
spot suspicious passenger behaviour, and a collision avoidance system 
that will correct the plane's trajectory to prevent it from being 
steered into a building or mountain.

The researchers are also investigating the possibility—although they say 
it is probably some 15 years away—of developing an on-board computer 
that could guide the plane automatically to the nearest airport, in the 
event of a hijack.

"You never reach zero level of threat, no risk," said programme 
coordinator Daniel Gaultier of French technology group SAGEM Defense 
Securite, a unit of Safran.

"But if you equip planes with on-board electronics, it will make them 
very, very difficult to hijack."

SMART PLANE

The 4-year, 35.8 million euro ($45.7 million) project, called SAFEE or 
Security of Aircraft in the Future European Environment, was launched in 
February 2004.

Among those taking part are aircraft maker Airbus, its parents EADS and 
BAE Systems, as well as Thales and Siemens AG. The
European Commission is contributing 19.5 million euros ($25 million).

Omer Laviv of Athena GS3, an Israeli company taking part in the project, 
said the system might be commercially available around 2010 to 2012.

SAFEE goes beyond the limited on-board improvements made since Sept. 
11—like reinforced cockpit doors and the deployment of sky marshals.

Proposed enhancements include:

-- A chip-based system to allocate matching tags to passengers and their 
luggage, ensuring both are on board and removing the need for stewards 
to count passengers manually.

—Cameras at check-in desks and at the entrance to the plane, in order to 
verify with biometric imaging that the person getting on board is the 
same as the one who checked in.

-- An "electronic nose" to check passengers for traces of explosives at 
the final ground check before boarding.

-- An Onboard Threat Detection System (OTDS) to process information from 
video and audio sensors throughout the cabin and detect any erratic 
passenger behaviour.

-- A Threat Assessment and Response Management System (TARMS) to 
assemble all information and propose an appropriate response to the 
pilot via a computer screen located at his side.

-- A Data Protection System to secure all communications, including 
conversations between the cockpit and ground control.

-- A secure cockpit door with a biometric system that recognises 
authorised crew by their fingerprints, together with a camera to check 
they are not opening it under duress.

-- An automatic collision avoidance system to correct the plane's course 
if it strays from a permitted trajectory.

TERRORIST IN CONTROL

In a Sept. 11-style hijack scenario, for example, the TARMS system would 
detect that the plane was on course to plough into buildings and use 
biometric fingerprint sensors to check whether the pilot or an intruder 
was at the controls.

"If there is a terrorist in control or the pilot is not aware of this 
(false) trajectory, the TARMS decides to avoid the obstacle so there is 
an automatic control of the plane," Gaultier said.

The avoidance system would also kick in if the pilot, despite verifying 
his identity, persisted in the false course.

Given its complexity, the SAFEE project raises legal and ethical issues 
which are themselves a key part of the research.

They include whether people will find it acceptable to be minutely 
observed by sensors throughout their flight, recording everything from 
their conversations to their toilet visits.

With help from sources including security agencies and behavioural 
psychologists, researchers are building a database of potentially 
suspicious traits for computers to detect.

"It could be someone who's using their mobile phone when they shouldn't 
be, or trying to light up a cigarette. But it could also be something 
much more extreme, it could be a potential terrorist," said James 
Ferryman, a scientist at Britain's Reading University who is working on 
SAFEE.

The sensitivity of the system could be adjusted depending on factors 
like the general threat level, he said.

Programme coordinator Gaultier conceded the system could generate false 
alarms, but said the crew and pilot would remain in ultimate control, 
deciding if the threat was real.

WHO PAYS?

The improved passenger surveillance, researchers say, will be an 
important advantage on larger planes such as the Airbus A380, capable of 
carrying 550 people.

They believe passengers will be ready to accept the trade-off of less 
privacy for the sake of greater safety.

"We have to show it's not Big Brother watching you, it's Big Brother 
looking after you," Ferryman said.

Researchers say it is too early to judge the price of kitting out a 
plane with SAFEE, but they are working closely with a user group 
including airlines like Air France-KLM.

The issue is part of a wider debate within the industry, with airlines 
calling on governments to underwrite security costs.

"Suicide terrorism is not an issue for the airlines, it shouldn't be 
their responsibility," said Philip Baum, editor of Aviation Security 
International magazine.

"It is an attack, actually, against the state and it's part of a 
national defence, and therefore we need to fund this accordingly."


Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to