To google or not to google? It's a legal question

Search engine's sense of humour crashes as it fires off warning letters 
over use of name as a verb

By Stephen Foley in New York
Published: 13 August 2006

http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/article1218805.ece

Search engine giant Google, known for its mantra "don't be evil", has 
fired off a series of legal letters to media organisations, warning them 
against using its name as a verb.

In June, Google won a place in the Oxford English Dictionary, while "to 
google", with a lower case "g", was included last month in 
Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, America's leading reference book.

The online service WordSpy, meanwhile, defines "google" as: "To search 
for information on the Web, particularly by using the Google search 
engine; to search the Web for information related to a new or potential 
girlfriend or boyfriend." This is also what pops up first if you type 
"googling" into Google.

But the California-based company is becoming concerned about trademark 
violation. A spokesman confirmed that it had sent the letters. "We think 
it's important to make the distinction between using the word Google to 
describe using Google to search the internet, and using the word Google 
to describe searching the internet. It has some serious trademark issues."

But although an attempt to protect the company's trademark, the letters 
have raised snickers after they were leaked on to the web. Bloggers have 
been making fun of the examples Google's lawyers deem acceptable. They 
included: "Appropriate: I ran a Google search to check out that guy from 
the party. Inappropriate: I googled that hottie."

Web veterans have also been taken aback by Google's suddenly humourless 
approach. The eight-year-old company has previously cultivated an image 
of youthful non-conformity, from the jeans and T-shirts often worn by 
its billionaire founders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, to the scooter 
lanes and volleyball courts at its Palo Alto headquarters.

Eyebrows may be raised, too, in the publishing and media industries, 
which are worried about Google's encroachment on their intellectual 
property via itsGoogle News pages and its plan to put every book ever 
published on to the web.

Search engine giant Google, known for its mantra "don't be evil", has 
fired off a series of legal letters to media organisations, warning them 
against using its name as a verb.

In June, Google won a place in the Oxford English Dictionary, while "to 
google", with a lower case "g", was included last month in 
Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, America's leading reference book.

The online service WordSpy, meanwhile, defines "google" as: "To search 
for information on the Web, particularly by using the Google search 
engine; to search the Web for information related to a new or potential 
girlfriend or boyfriend." This is also what pops up first if you type 
"googling" into Google.

But the California-based company is becoming concerned about trademark 
violation. A spokesman confirmed that it had sent the letters. "We think 
it's important to make the distinction between using the word Google to 
describe using Google to search the internet, and using the word Google 
to describe searching the internet. It has some serious trademark issues."
But although an attempt to protect the company's trademark, the letters 
have raised snickers after they were leaked on to the web. Bloggers have 
been making fun of the examples Google's lawyers deem acceptable. They 
included: "Appropriate: I ran a Google search to check out that guy from 
the party. Inappropriate: I googled that hottie."

Web veterans have also been taken aback by Google's suddenly humourless 
approach. The eight-year-old company has previously cultivated an image 
of youthful non-conformity, from the jeans and T-shirts often worn by 
its billionaire founders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, to the scooter 
lanes and volleyball courts at its Palo Alto headquarters.

Eyebrows may be raised, too, in the publishing and media industries, 
which are worried about Google's encroachment on their intellectual 
property via itsGoogle News pages and its plan to put every book ever 
published on to the web.



Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to