On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Bryan Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It also feels like something is >> missing here. I really don't see any mention of our team's role in >> code review and stewardship of quality for MediaWiki and >> responsibility for security and performance considerations. >> > > +1, although that may fall under the extremely broad "Ensure that > MediaWiki core is meeting the evolving needs of the website". > That's the problem with "responsibilities" instead of a "mission". One changes/evolves much more quickly than the other. I see responsibilities as the "how" and the mission as the "why"-ish. Why does Core Team do all of this (disconnected at times) work? Because (partially from what Chris quoted): "[S]tability, security, performance and architectural cleanliness of the system" is important and this is the (only) team that can lead the work. -- Greg Grossmeier Release Team Manager
_______________________________________________ MediaWiki-Core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-core
