Hi Yury,
hi folks,

first: thank you for your initiative. The crazy thing about MediaWiki is, that 
it is used in thousands of companies and organizations. But in the Wikimedia 
ecosystem the vendor sector and the zone of third-party users are for some 
reasons underdeveloped, especially in comparison with other open source 
projects. Say Joomla! or Drupal.
So we (Hallo Welt!, Germany) would appreciate, if there are more MediaWiki 
companies and more MediaWiki developers, cooperating with each-other, because 
this helps everybody and it boosts the Wikimedia universe and the wiki ideas.

Anyway we (Hallo Welt) have a bundle of success stories, we can and we will 
share with you. A few are even published on our weblog (but unfortunately in 
German). In a first step I will answer the questions in general.

- What was the project about?
Most of our projects are internal wikis. The classical use case is any sort of 
documentation and quality assurance (the Germans....). The demand for public 
wikis is increasing, but in the public sphere budgets are always very low.  
That means: Wikis for commerce and industry are very important for us.

- Who was the customer? Was it an open project?
I don't know, what you understand as "open" project? Customers came from 
everywhere. But there are some difficult sectors: finance industry, education 
and the public sector. But maybe this is only our experience. Some others 
probably have their success just in this fields.

- What the community looked like? Where those people on the wiki came from?
Even if the company or organization need a wiki, they often don't know it. They 
are looking for document management system or other types of software.
Mostly a single person (the maintainer), see that for their use case wiki is an 
alternative or the right way. And he or she (!) has to fight internally for 
this solution. In the end, the users, the employees are always happy with it.

- Why you've chosen MediaWiki and not another solution?
Most famous software, high acceptance, leading open source wiki software - in 
my opinion. The only alternative to Atlassians Confluence. Dokuwiki, FOSS, 
TWIKI, Confluence and others is great software. Good work. But MediaWiki is 
ahead for knowledge management and documentation solutions

- Did you program anything additional for MediaWiki, did you integrate with 
some other services and applications?
The BlueSpice MediaWiki Enterprise Distribution. We'd love to open this project 
for developers, partners and reseller. And we start, if somebody is asking for 
it.
We have some bridges to StatusNet microblogging software, Microsoft SharePoint. 
In two projects we have integrated MediaWiki and ELGG.

- Or maybe you've elaborated some tricky methodology?
Oh. We have made several standardizations. But this is a question for our 
technical head :)

- How did the project change the life of your customer?
If a company or an organization has introduced MediaWiki you can hardly kill 
it. It will become part of your daily live.

- Was the community motivated? How active they were?
You never can motivate. There is motivation or not. The only thing you can do 
is destroying motivation. And the most companies are very successful in doing 
that.

- Did you provide any kind of support and consulting?
Consulting, project management, development, migration, skinning support and 
maintenance...

- Maybe you've provided admins, moderators, facilitators? How did you teach 
them?
Via Workshops and telephone conferences.

- Did you have any trainings?
User and admin trainings

- Anything about money? $-)
:) The wide range from 5.000 Euro up to 150.000 Euro. But the average project 
in Germany has a value of 10 to 30.000 Euro. Sounds a lot. For software project 
it isn't. We have 14 hungry employees... with families, children, parents ....

- What obstacles and difficulties have you faced?
1. Years ago customers always compare MediaWiki with Confluence or they have an 
expensive SharePoint project.
2. Wiki never have the highest priority for CEOs. CRM or ERP solutions are 
always ahead.
3. No time for working with the wiki.

- How much time did you spend on a different stages of your project?
First contact until project start: half year  (average). Some came round after 
two years.
Planning: on/two  months
Installation, Customizing: depends

- In general: was it worth it?
Yes, always. But: We need much more technical standardization. Extension 
management! Testing and customizing extensions take time. Too much in my 
opinion.

Greetings!
Richard Heigl
_______________________________________________
Mediawiki-enterprise mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-enterprise

Reply via email to