Thank you. Since I am a bit skeptical concerning Google analytics, I have turned to PIWIK, which seem to work quite similar as OWA. Any reason, why OWA might be preferable?
B. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Peter Adams Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. September 2010 09:32 An: MediaWiki announcements and site admin list Betreff: Re: [Mediawiki-l] statistics, counter Try Open Web Analytics. It comes with a built in extension for tracking users of your mediawiki. metrics include page views, visits, article creation/edit/deletion and a whole lot more. http://www.openwebanalytics.com -P- -- Peter Adams <[email protected]> Open Web Analytics http://www.openwebanalytics.com/ On Sep 19, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Scheid, Bernhard wrote: > I am searching for an extension that shows the developments of hits on my > wiki comparable to, for instance, [statcounter.com]. User came from, search > queries, etc, would also be good to know. So far, I only found > Extension:Usage Statistics, which produces strange output on my Wiki and is > moreover unpleasant to handle. Any suggestions? > > Thx > > Bernhard > > PS: For the moment I have installed statcounter.com, which requires some > loading time, however, since it is loading an external JS file. There should > be a more elegant solution since the data are there, aren't they? > _______________________________________________ > MediaWiki-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
