On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Adam Meyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...]The trick? Better content than the competition.[...] > I am not sure if i can confirm that. Let me show you an example. If you google "Corporate Social Responsibility" you see of course a good Wikipedia article with ~5 Page on top, followed by many many other sites with low content. I have written ~30 Page essay about it, very detailled, very scientific etc. (published 2 months ago) and I come somewhere on google page 27. But all about I am not sure if 2 months are enough and if It needs more time. But I could give you other examples aswell, where I wrote a lot of scientific stuff and other sites just a lot of google pages infront of me while I am on page 16 etc. On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Adam Meyer <[email protected]> wrote: > I would agree 90% with that. My wiki shows up pretty high in google > searches (top first page) with out any SEO. The trick? Better content than > the competition. > I do use "keywords" in my writing however. Instead of saying "it" or other > ambiguous words, I use the actual name of the part I am writing about once a > paragraph. > > > On Mar 20, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Chad wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:27 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I always thought that with Google being the 800-lb gorilla, that Meta > tags > >> were worthless. > >> > > > > Pretty much since the gorilla doesn't even care about them. > > > > Also: SEO is a silly buzzword to sell consulting services. > > > > -Chad > > > > _______________________________________________ > > MediaWiki-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l > > > _______________________________________________ > MediaWiki-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l > _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
