On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Dave Humphrey <[email protected]> wrote:
> Another way to look at it is how many page requests Squid/Varnish can
> eliminate from Apache. In our MediaWiki Squid has an average cache hit
> rate of 85% which means the Apache page requests is 6.5x smaller. For
> small wikis this isn't a big deal but as you scale up reducing Apache
> requests by a factor of  6 is huge. Since RationalWiki appears to be
> kinda of in the middle you just have to ask yourself whether page
> access numbers or the Apache load is more important.
>

Indeed. If you've got caches in front of Apache, you won't even
increment the hit counter on many requests. It's why our reports
are pulled from the squid logs themselves.

-Chad

_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l

Reply via email to