Very helpful.  Thanks.




>________________________________
> From: Stip <[email protected]>
>To: MediaWiki announcements and site admin list 
><[email protected]> 
>Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 9:13 AM
>Subject: Re: [MediaWiki-l] Wiki spam. Stronger fightback.
> 
>
>Our wiki has been spam-free for over a year now, despite anonymous 
>editing being allowed, while keeping the inconvenience for legitimate 
>editors to a bare minimum. Here is what we're doing:
>
>First, we use ConfirmEdit with QuestyCaptcha, but only for 
>"createaccount" and "badlogin". We ask community-specific questions, and 
>the answer is not a word in the question; seems to work perfectly, we 
>didnt have a bot-account for over a year now (also, we dont allow 
>numbers in account-names, which probably helps too).
>If we would require editors to be logged-in, we probably wouldnt need 
>any other spam-protection. Since we do want to allow anonymous editing, 
>we also use the Abuse-Filter-Extension with Filters that only trigger 
>for users that are not autoconfirmed (autoconfirmed-status is given in 
>our wiki once the first edit was successful).
>One of the filters (probably the most important) requires users to do 
>something specific if they want to create a new page (most spammers try 
>to create new pages); if they dont, their edit is blocked. This specific 
>action could be anything, from adding a certain word to using specific 
>wiki-markup or using a certain edit-summary. Ideally, every wiki using 
>this concept should require a different action, just like 
>QuestyCaptcha-Questions will differ for every wiki. That way, spammers 
>cant adjust their bots to it.
>And what about spammers that edit existing pages? Luckily, they almost 
>always add links, and they almost always delete existing text, so one 
>can construct filters to stop that.
>
>In summary: Interested editors have to answer a simple question if they 
>want to create a new account. After that, they can do whatever they 
>want, without being watched by the filter. Anonymous editors have to do 
>something specific if they want to create a new page or add new links - 
>or they could just create a new account. And spammers are blocked 
>completely.
>
>So, in my opinion, the following should be done to help new wikis combat 
>spam:
>
>1. Bundle ConfirmEdit and AbuseFilter with each MediaWiki-Download.
>2. Make QuestyCaptcha the default for ConfirmEdit. It is easy to use and 
>more effective than recaptcha, cause it cant be solved by paid workers 
>from the other side of the planet while allowing interested, legitimate 
>editors to pass (if your questions are good enough).
>3. AbuseFilter should have a pre-installed filter (or at least a link to 
>a help page with examples).
>4. The section about AbuseFilter on Manual:Combating_spam should contain 
>examples or a link to a page with examples.
>
>examples:
>
>!("autoconfirmed" in user_groups)
>& (action == "edit")
>& (article_articleid == 0)
>& !("your phrase or wiki markup" in new_wikitext)
>
>alternativly:
>
>!("autoconfirmed" in user_groups)
>& (action == "edit")
>& (article_articleid == 0)
>& !("your phrase" in summary)
>
>another alternative:
>
>!("autoconfirmed" in user_groups)
>& (action == "edit")
>& ((article_articleid == 0)|(length(added_links) >= 1))
>& !("your phrase" in summary)
>
>Obviously, the message telling the editor that his edit was blocked 
>should mention what he has to do if he wants his edit to be saved, so 
>the notes of the pre-installed filter should contain a link to 
>MediaWiki:abusefilter-disallowed.
>
>The really important thing here is that spammers cant adjust to these 
>measures if every wiki asks different question and demands different 
>actions for edits from anonymous users.
>
>
>Also, we have been using the already mentioned bot-trap from 
>danielwebb.us/software/bot-trap for some time now. Since legitimate 
>users can unblock themselves, it really doesnt hurt to use it.
>
>Greetings
>Stip
>
>_______________________________________________
>MediaWiki-l mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l

Reply via email to