All messages should be posted in plain text. HTML will be converted to attachments. The meditech-l web site is MTUsers.com ======================================
James: It is true that we all know of instances where C/S or Magic is better, but Meditech's stated corporate goal is to provide similar functionality and even the same look and feel, regardless of the platform. I think it will be more or a site preference, than a platform's superiority. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James A. Purvins Sent: March 30,2006 9:23 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [MEDITECH-L] Magic vs Client Server Functionality Matrix ByApplication All messages should be posted in plain text. HTML will be converted to attachments. The meditech-l web site is MTUsers.com ====================================== Hello All, Does Meditech publish a Magic vs Client Server functionality matrix by application? There MUST be some type of document outlining the major functionality differences between the two platforms. For example, let's take report scheduling functionality. With no additional cost or investment, the Magic Report Scheduler is far superior to anything available in Client Server. From what I've heard, some Billing functionalities exist in Client Server that are better developed than Magic. Has anyone requested such a document from Meditech? Does anyone out there in Meditech-L Land know of any major functionality differences between Client Server and Magic? Jim Purvins -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/298 - Release Date: 3/30/2006 _______________________________________________ meditech-l mailing list [email protected] http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l _______________________________________________ meditech-l mailing list [email protected] http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
