All messages should be posted in plain text. HTML will be converted to attachments. The meditech-l web site is MTUsers.com ======================================
any data integrity problems during meditech upgrades? we were off for weeks when we upgraded to 5.4 (magic). we also notice problems at the beginning of the month, but not as serious. regards, ganesh -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 6:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Are Interface Engines Necessary? All messages should be posted in plain text. HTML will be converted to attachments. The meditech-l web site is MTUsers.com ====================================== Deborah: We audit our DR regularly using Blue Elm's DR Auditor. There are many tables that are consistently perfect, for example timecards and ICD9's back to 1985. The key tables for B/AR visits, financial summary information, charges, and colletion transactions are consistently very accurate. We have had occasionl hiccups, but they are trivial. For example, we had slow transmissions of charges during monthend sometime ago. In general, most of the data is very reliable. Sometimes a table will have just one field that is questionable. More often than not, those fields are ones we are not concerned with. When problems are brought to Meditech's attention, they are cooperative about following up and fixing them. So, the short answer is yes. We are confident that the data in DR is accurate enough and timely enough for any meaningful application. Thomas Stephen Laxar Coordinator, Hospital Information Systems Children's Hospital Oakland 510-428-3833 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ meditech-l mailing list [email protected] http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
