Lori  -  With the brand name, using the default of C in the access
dictionary, here is what I get:

1  SINEQUAN 10 MG CAP             Doxepin HCl 10 MG CAP
DOXE10C

2  SINEQUAN 100 MG CAP            Doxepin HCl 100 MG CAP
DOXE100C

3  SINEQUAN 25 MG CAP             Doxepin HCl 25 MG CAP
DOXE25C

4  SINEQUAN 50 MG CAP             Doxepin HCl 50 MG CAP
DOXE50C

5  SINEQUAN 75 MG CAP             Doxepin HCl 75 MG CAP
DOXE75C

6  SINEQUAN ORAL CONC 1 ML        Doxepin HCl 10 MG/ML ML
DOXEL120

 

Entering the generic name - I get this:

1  DOXEPIN HCL                    Doxepin HCl 100 MG CAP
DOXE100C

2  DOXEPIN HCL                    Doxepin HCl 10 MG CAP
DOXE10C

3  DOXEPIN HCL                    Doxepin HCl 25 MG CAP
DOXE25C

4  DOXEPIN HCL                    Doxepin HCl 50 MG CAP
DOXE50C

5  DOXEPIN HCL                    Doxepin HCl 75 MG CAP
DOXE75C

6  DOXEPIN HCL                    Doxepin HCl 10 MG/ML ML
DOXEL120

 

So, it doesn't even seem to be consistent as to which is first between a
brand name look-up and a generic name look-up. But I do agree that this is a
safety issue and makes sense. Furthermore, if Meditech and the formulary
service vendors could get their dose range checking working correctly, it
would be less of an issue. I've built a lot of my own dose ranges because
the ones with FDB give too many worthless alerts. I believe that the bigger
issue here is that a dose range check would have caught this.

Charlie

 

 

Charles Downs PharmD

Washington County Hospital

251 E. Antietam Street

Hagerstown, MD, 21740

301-790-8904

 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Howes, Lori
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 4:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [MEDITECH-L] MIX Request PHA - ISMP NOTICE LARGE DOSE AT TOP MIX

 

Hello,

Our Pharmacy department has created a MIX request, and is hoping to get
other Meditech PHA users to join us to convince Meditech that this is
something we need them to look at.  Here is our request;

 

Brief Description/Synopsis of Request

When selecting a Drug, we would like the lowest strength to be the first
selection.

 

How are you currently handling this now?

We have no workaround.

 

What problem will be resolved?

Our system has the potential to contribute to a similar error like the one
below that happened at another hospital;

In an outpatient pharmacy located in a hospital, a prescription for SINEQUAN
(doxepin) 100 mg was entered into the computer and dispensed instead of the
correct strength of 10 mg. Neither the technician who pulled the 100 mg
strength from the shelf nor the verifying pharmacist caught the error. The
patient took 500 mg of doxepin daily for one month before the error was
corrected. The error was discovered when the prescription was transferred to
another pharmacy and the receiving pharmacist expressed concern about the
high dosage.  Since the error, the patient has been experiencing residual
drowsiness and fatigue. The physician is now slowly decreasing the dosage.
The pharmacy software system may have played a role in the error. Upon
entering  Sinequan  on the product line, the list of matching results placed
Sinequan 100 mg on the first line followed by Sinequan 10 mg.  It is
believed that the sequential listing of both strengths, with a ten-fold
difference, contributed to the selection of the wrong strength, as did the
listing of the higher

strength first.

 

Proposed Solution

  Describe in detail how you think the system could be changed, considering
Dictionaries Parameters, Input and Output Screens, and Reports.

  When selecting a Drug, we would like the lowest strength to be the first
selection.

 

System Impact

  Describe why this enhancement is important.

How does it improve the MEDITECH system?

What impact will it have on users?

It will lessen the impact of user error.

 

Although neither is acceptable, user error is inevitable and the thought
process is that underdosing is less dangerous than overdosing.

 

 

 

Lori Howes 

Business Systems Analyst - Clinical Support

Niagara Health System - Cecil G Shaver Data Centre

541 Glenridge Avenue

St. Catharines, ON

L2T 4C2

 

905-378-4647 X44857 

 

  _____  

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender
by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 



***** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *****
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for
the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system.

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit 
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l_mtusers.com

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please visit and add information to the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l_mtusers.com

Reply via email to