On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 00:11 +0200, ext Ville M. Vainio wrote: > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Quim Gil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Actually by having a point of coordination here that involved Forum > > Nokia, the Intel Developer Program etc we will help avoiding duplication > > much better than by trying to figure out what is the part of the work > > none of these companies will take. > > There are certainly virtues to this idea, we should just proceed it > and see how much momentum it can gather. > > What coordination tools do we need? A mailing list, coordination wiki > page, issue tracker, ...?
When it comes to http://wiki.meego.com/Community_Office/Marketing#Tasks that wiki page is the best starting point. It would be great to hear from the mouth of these companies whether that list of tasks has the right items and priorities in relation to their needs. It would be very useful to know in which items certain company is already working, whether they are looking for help or not. This would be a first level of coordination on top of the tasks themselves, without much need of deep day to day coordination. If the owners of a task are identified and they work for company AA, then it is much easier for companies BB, CC and DD to go ask and share plans and potential collaboration at a deeper level. These discussions can be done in this list or they can be initiated via email, etc. Sometimes they involve budgets, contractors and other sensitive topics. Since the goals of the task are public the work itself can be public too, at least in terms of who has committed to deliver what, where is the help needed, etc. -- Quim _______________________________________________ MeeGo-community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community
