On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Till Harbaum / Lists <[email protected]> wrote:
>> There is a consistent roadmap. It's qml all the way. > Argh ... nobody is trying question your qml. It's about allwing additional > options and not reducing them. > For some reason you want to limit the number of supported frameworks. Why? > Just because "someone > said so" is not a valid reason. Limiting the number of supported frameworks creates an obvious direction for the developers. This is good for the platform overall. Of course we can have "community level" support for everything starting with Cobol, as long as we make it obvious to the developers that the support is not official. > Ok, i agree that there's a roadmap for qml. But that roadmap already includes > a known end date (the > day the last symbian device is being built). Yeah, i know, others are invited > to take over Nokias abandoned > technologies ... but let's be serious: That won't happen. Why should someone > start to build symbian > phones if he could also build android phones? As said, it was announced that Qt is used in Nokia's "next billion" plan, which has no known end date (nor does it have a public start date). _______________________________________________ MeeGo-community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
