2011/8/9 Andrew Flegg <[email protected]> > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 17:12, Timo Härkönen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > The community QA was originally discussed in meego-sdk ml [1] but it > might > > reach an wider audience here. > > Agreed, thanks for re-raising it. > > > The current proposed QA process [2] looks good but I'd like the check > list > > also to include things related to the packaging policy [3] in addition to > > checking that it has a meaningful description. For example is the > > application is going to a suitable group (games, science, etc.) and such > > things to avoid the reposity structure becoming a mess. > > Good plan; I'd imagine that any _invalid_ group would be ignored by > both the Apps' client and prevented by the promotion interface (as on > maemo.org/packages). However, a verification that it's a *sensible* > group also makes sense. > > Do you want to add it to the wiki? >
Added it to the same optional section as description -Timo
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
