>On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 04:28:59PM -0700, [email protected] >wrote: >> > Hi Arjan, >> > >> > These 2 MeeGo patches are for Intel Medfield USB Gadget driver support. >> > They are made against 35. >> > >> > 001 usb gadget: add Intel ACM composite gadget for Medfield >> > 002 usb gadget: add support for Medfield >> > >> >> I can shed a little more light on how this could be used. This driver >> provides separate tty ports to allow separation of distinct data channels >> out of a device in the field through the micro-USB port to a diagnostic >> tool hooked up to that device via that micro-USB port. So for example, >> one of the tty ports could be a command-and-control connection to the >> device, whereas another tty port could be used in conjunction with the >> n_tracerouter and n_tracesink ldiscs to extract modem debug data out of >> the system. > >But why does this have to be a platform specific gadget? What's wrong >with the acm gadget support we already have in the main kernel tree? >Why duplicate that work here?
That's true, mainline kernel has already support it with gadget/serial.c. So from this point, patch 1 for ACM is useless. Please ignore that 001 patch. Thanks Hao _______________________________________________ Meego-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel
