> >> Upstream status:
> >>> Patch 0001: implemented eMMC4.4 hardware reset feature in MMC core
> layer.
> >> http://marc.info/?t=128801640800002&r=1&w=2
> >>> Patch 0002: implemented hardware reset callback for sdhci layer.
> >> cant seem to find this :(
> >>> Patch 0003: implemented the real reset eMMC card part in sdhci host
> controller
> >> driver.
> >> neither this.
> > I did send them out. Maybe they go into your junk mail...Sorry for that.
> I am personally not subscribed to linux-mmc list, I just checked the
> linux-mmc archive with the subject
> patch2:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&w=2&r=1&s=implemented+hardware+reset+callba
> ck&q=t
> Patch3:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&w=2&r=1&s=implemented+the+real+reset+eMMC
> &q=t
>
> maybe you could post the
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mmc/list/ link instead to
> help us- I am probably going blind now a days with caffeine and cant
> seem to find it :(
Several days ago I just submitted one patch to linux-mmc mail list which is the
same with this submission but without the patch3. You can find it by
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/267032/. By sending this patch to linux-mmc
list, I want to get some advice on whether it is suitable for driver to set
RST_n_FUNCTION bit in ext_csd register. But till now I did not get any
response. Hope this would be also helpful to you.
_______________________________________________
Meego-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel
