On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 22:33:09 +0000
"Busson, SebastienX" <[email protected]> wrote:

> From 4055d12d73d305c9fa68ab09019f2dacb240f6e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jonathan DE CESCO <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:12:44 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Enable TI Wl12xx BT Initialization in Medfield init
> file
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/mrst.c |   44
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 44
> insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

No decription, no signed off from the author...


> +static int __init btfm_init(void)
> +{
> +     int retval = 0;
> +    int bt_enable;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Shared transport (BT and FM)
> +     */
> +
> +    /* Get the GPIO number from the SFI table */
> +    bt_enable   = get_gpio_by_name("BT-reset"); /*Name as defined in
> the SFI table*/
> +    if (bt_enable == -1)
> +    {
> +        printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Unable to find BT-reset GPIO in the SFI
> table\n", __func__);
> +        retval = -EIO;
> +        goto out;
> +    }

How about actually checking to see if the hardware is present, surely
this should be coming off the platform tables - what do you expect this
to do on other systems - just crash them ?

_______________________________________________
MeeGo-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel

Reply via email to