Yes, there are Medfield program requirements for runtime PM and for Self Test -- which the nVidia driver didn't have.
Also, the ak8975 driver (nCDK) was intended to have compatible interfaces with the ak8974 driver (iCDK), since we'll be using the same AKM library. -----Original Message----- From: Arjan van de Ven [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 6:03 AM To: Alan Cox Cc: Dunatov, Mark; Gackstetter, Tim; Berenjian, Nader; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Meego-kernel] ak8975 driver re-submission (eliminated compiler warnings) On 11/9/2010 5:28 AM, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:49:26 -0800 > "Dunatov, Mark"<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> Here is the full driver patch w/out the 3 compiler warnings, as >> requested. > We've already got one in staging - written by Nvidia. Is there a > reason we can't use that ? PLONK (the sound of this patch dropping out of the MeeGo tree pending the other driver going in) _______________________________________________ MeeGo-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel
