> I think we should probably just leave that as is for now - at least > until we know what is going to happen to Moorestown SEP support.
Note that Medfield has IMR support, which to SEP will look just like RAR on Moorestown. Thus, please don't throw away SEP RAR code just yet (but it's ok to disable it for now). --Eugene -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan Cox Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 8:39 AM To: Allyn, Mark A Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Meego-kernel] [PATCH 1/1] staging: sep: update sep driver for Medfield On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:54:01 -0800 (PST) "Mark A. Allyn" <[email protected]> wrote: > that the callback function is defined and not used. It is indeed > used at line 3826. This may be due to a bug in the compiler. Actually gcc is right. If you build without RAR support then the inline "no-operation" RAR handlers don't use the callback argument and gcc is smart enough to work this out, display the warning and eliminate the function from the build. I think we should probably just leave that as is for now - at least until we know what is going to happen to Moorestown SEP support. _______________________________________________ MeeGo-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel _______________________________________________ MeeGo-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel
