YunPeng, > drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 96 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 20 ++++++++++ > drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
This patch looks like it is *very* intrusive. There's a big chance that you will be kicked from upstream :) The semantic does not sound like there is a very difference from what runtime_pm patches are doing. You will need an acquire_ownership() at the same place you would need a pm_runtime_get() Why an acquire_ownership() could not be called in the runtime_pm resume callback? And release_ownership() could be called in the runtime_pm suspend callback? Regards, Pierre --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation SAS (French simplified joint stock company) Registered headquarters: "Les Montalets"- 2, rue de Paris, 92196 Meudon Cedex, France Registration Number: 302 456 199 R.C.S. NANTERRE Capital: 4,572,000 Euros This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. _______________________________________________ MeeGo-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel
