On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:47:23AM +0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 3/27/2011 7:47 PM, Feng Tang wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:34:22 +0800
> > Arjan van de Ven<[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/27/2011 7:29 PM, Lu Guanqun wrote:
> >>> Export get_gpio_by_name() function and make its name more focused.
> >>> We are doing this because currently get_gpio_by_name() is only used
> >>> by the devices exported from SFI DEVS table, but it is also useful
> >>> for other PCI devices which also use the GPIO lines, and have their
> >>> gpio infos in the SFI GPIO table.
> >>>
> >> I can't say that I like the new name... at all.
> >>
> >> what's "mid" ?
> >> what is wrong with the original name????
> >>
> > Hi Arjan,
> >
> > The original get_gpio_by_name() is static and only used in mrst.c as it's
> > mrst/mfld specific. So if we call it from a PCI driver, that name sounds
>
> get_gpio_by_name() would be a very good generic name for a function
> provided by the gpio layer as well.
>
> > like a platform independent general API while it's actually mrst/mfld bound.
> > So we would show this dependency from the function name.
> that makes no sense.
> and again, what on earth is a "mid"??????????
>
MID stands for mobile internet device.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_Internet_device
--
guanqun
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel
