On 9/23/10 11:14 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Reason: and the bug is? (needs to be in the changelog) >> >> see the message. >> >>> Message: >>> QMF BuildRequires, part of BMC#5953 >>> This package contains upstream bugfix only. >> >> Does it makes sense to put the bug number on every needed reverse BR? >> In current case, QMF is the package affected by the bug. >> QMF was accepted but BR on libaccounts-qt, rejected: qmf is broken in >> Trunk:Testing. > > Now, it's broken in Trunk also. > > Bug created for this purpose: > http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7258 > QMF fails to build on Trunk caused by outdated > build requirements (libaccounts-glib/libaccounts-qt) > > New submit request: > SR#7785 > SR#7786 Thanks Fathi... rs > > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-packaging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging > _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
