On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:47:39 -0700 Chris Ferron <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/24/2010 09:32 AM, Shane Bryan wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:14:18 -0700 (PDT) > > Chris Ferron<[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Connie Berardi, > >> The following change has been rejected. > >> > >> Reason: Please change the status your feature. Please fix and > >> re-submit. > > Sure would be nice to have had this reviewed and rejected well > > *BEFORE* the image is about to be created so there is a chance to > > *do* something about it. > > > SR was submitted and mail went out at 3:30ishpm last night. That puts > it in line for review this morning. > I dedicate the first several hours of each day for package review, > and attempt to review commits when time permits after that. > If anyone has a package that needs to be in, suggestion is to not > wait until the absolute deadline for the cycle to submit, and to > insure that the submittal is complete and all bugs and feature are > resolved fixed. In this instance please just disposition the bug and > re-submit. Chris, My apologies. I have since reviewed the matching Changes and accepted (declined) messages in the ML again and see that I was jumping to conclusions based on too small a time sample (and with the prejudice of past experiences). I see now that you have been accepting (or declining) SRs usually w/in 24 hours of their submission (give or take a weekend, holiday, random chaos). So, I should say THANKS for being on top of that, and forgive my knee jerk reaction. All I can san in my defense is that I was personally impacted, since my SR (#7809) included a PkgBR: against that version (0.0.35) of libseaside-devel, so I assumed it would end up in the eventual reversal of your previous acceptance. Best Regards, Shane... _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
