On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 13:23, Alberto Mardegan
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Developer releases liblib 1.0, and that gets packaged into Meego. Then he
> refactors it so that all methods are twice as fast. We writes "All methods
> are twice as fast" in the commit message of the SVC repository, then he
> packages it for MeeGo and writes the same comment in the .changes file.
> Isn't that good enough information? Why do we want to force him to go
> through the extra burden of creating a bug or feature request?

Certainly part of the problem is that good release management,
changelogs etc. aren't necessarily compatible with weekly release
cycles and tracking versions.

It boils down to auditability and reasoning, IME. In your case of
liblib, the methods should, ideally, be refactored under a public
issue tracking item (possibly called "Performance") which would list
all the problems faced etc.

For liblib's new version to be included in MeeGo though, experience
would suggest there'd be a bug on bugs.meego.com called "Update liblib
to 1.x" with the description describing the benefits this gives to the
MeeGo stack; the verification that it hasn't broken any of the
Compliance guarantees; the version in which it will be included etc.

> What about rewording the criteria like this:
> "The .changes file must clearly describe the new features, bugfixes and
> improvements, and contain references to all the MeeGo.com bugs and features
> addressed, if any."

Ultimately, everything's being done for *some* reason on MeeGo.
Perhaps a placeholder issue (per release/milestone) for some rapidly
developing library which is primarily targetting MeeGo would be
sufficient? For example, it could be a feature of the form "Provide a
mechanism for applications to start quickly" which is met my
*multiple* changes to applauncherd.

Cheers,

Andrew

-- 
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:[email protected] http://www.bleb.org/
Maemo Community Council member
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-packaging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging

Reply via email to