(Apologies for lousy quoting) ----- Original message ----- > > On 2010-12-23, at 9:48 AM, Carsten Munk wrote: > > Do we have a decision from someone about what packages will be > > downgraded because of GPLv3, just to keep track? > > > > (am not protesting the downgrade, it will be interesting to see if > > things work properly and how security fixes from later versions will > > be handled and consequence for stuff like binutils and gcc) > > > > Even a metabug would be good :) > > Yes exactly, we need a 'dummy' bug :) > > <rant> > Most of my package changes recently took much more less time than > creating the associated bug. </rant>
Yeah, I know the feeling.. I meant a metabug along lines of http://bugs.meego.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=11429&hide_resolved=0 for the GPLv3 stuff, not for the reason that we have a requirement of having bugs for getting accepted. Reason for this would be to help to track issues happening because of the downgrades and allow people to see what'll change in order to prepare for the downgrades. /carsten _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
