On 1/10/11 9:27 PM, "Zhu, Peter J" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: Arjan van de Ven [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 1:23 PM >> To: Zhu, Peter J >> Cc: Selbak, Rolla N; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [meego-commits] 11716: Changes to Trunk:Testing/powertop >> >> On 1/10/2011 7:06 PM, Zhu, Peter J wrote: >>> Why fork two powertop? We never fork CORE packages. >>> >>> For powertop, I don't understand we need old top if you would like > new >> features of latest powertop >> >> Rolla suggested it for one release as a transition, just in case there >> are bugs with the new code...... > New version always might have bugs. Please just use new version or hold > on until new version is good enough. I already talked to Arjan about this in length. Please accept this Peter. Forking is because the new powertop is a complete re-engineering of powertop, and is in Beta stages, which for our purposes is good enough. Keeping the old powertop around is for QA since they might need it for diagnostics, and I don't want to hinder their process (they're already pressured enough). So please accept... Thanks much, rs > > Peter _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
