> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anas Nashif [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 9:35 PM
> To: Zhu, Peter J
> Cc: [email protected]; Li, Peng; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [meego-packaging] [meego-commits] 12054: Changes to
> Trunk:Testing/libxcb
> 
> 
> On 17 Jan 2011, at 10:30, Zhu, Peter J wrote:
> 
> > It's asking for a new version of so basic package just before one week off
> feature freeze. If you look how many packages has build dependency on this,
> it's a huge list.
> >
> 
> What other deadline would have the submitter had to comply with? Isn't that
> the who idea of having a feature freeze deadline?
> 
I don't say it's too late. I don't reject this. It's just a fact. It's a basic 
package, right? Just like kernel/Xserver/Mesa/Toolchain, they should be stable 
as early as possible in a release cycle. 

Peter

> 
> > So my question is:
> > 1.      Does new meegotouch-compositor really have use
> xcb_discard_reply()? Could we use another way to do same thing?
> > 2,.  If we have to does anybody ever know how many API/ABI changes for
> 1.5->1.7? Does all packages using libxcb build successfully against new 1.7?
> Does it really work for 1.7?
> >

_______________________________________________
MeeGo-packaging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging

Reply via email to