On 1/17/11 2:19 AM, "Tapio Rantala" <[email protected]> wrote:
> pe, 2011-01-14 kello 14:55 +0100, ext Carsten Munk kirjoitti: >> Think it originates from the history of mce-dev in Maemo - mce-dev was >> seperated from mce long ago so the source code for it was available >> (and it was used in all Maemo Hildon apps, practically). >> >> mce was closed source back then. mce-devel probably defines the D-Bus >> interface. > > Yes, it has only the dbus interface definition, only #defines. Also I > think there was a circular build dependency at one point which was > solved by this separation (this doesn't apply in meego). IMHO it would > be good it they would be combined under single source again. > >>> Exactly, also I'm curious why such package has different version than mce >>> source tar ball? > > It's a interface, which is stable compared to mce internals. It would be > clearer if the versions matched, but it seems silly to push new versions > only to change the version number. I agree, let's just the versions the way they are, and the .spec correctly defines which version of mce is needed in any case... > >>>> since mcd-devel only has headers, I would propose to call the package >>>> mce-headers, since -devel package are usually sub-packages of a main >>>> package, >>>> just to avoid confusion. > > I'd be happy to use -headers if that is the consensus. Then I might > wonder why other -devel packages with only headers are not renamed to > -headers. If you can just rename the pkg to mce-headers, that would be great... Thanks, rs > > > -- > Tapio Rantala > > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-packaging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging > _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
