I believe I've just resolved this and resubmitted as sr#12484. If this isn't the change that was expected, please provide more detail as to what is expected.
To be clear: * We aren't trying to fork libcreds. The functionality in libcreds3 supersedes the functionality in libcreds2 and the API's are not interchangeable. * Libcreds3 obsoletes all versions of libcreds2. * Libcreds3 and libcreds2 should not both be installed on a system. * The libcreds2-audit and libcreds2-tests will never have libcreds3 alternatives. Ryan On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:54 PM, Peter Zhu wrote: > Hi rrware, > The following change has been rejected. > > Reason: > different sub packages provides/obsoletes different packages.List them in > sub packages; And we generally don't fork package, why not name as just > libcreds and then update all existing packages > > Please fix the issues above and resubmit. > > Thanks, > MeeGo Release Engineering Team > > [This message was auto-generated] > --- > > Request #12359: > > submit: devel:security/libcreds3(r9) -> Trunk:Testing/libcreds3 > > > Message: > * Wed Jan 19 2011 Ryan Ware <[email protected]> - 1.3.1 > - Fixed obsoletes and provides so that this package meets the requirements > for any package needing a libcreds2 >= 1.3.0. > - Removed building of static libraries. > - FEA#9093 > > State: declined 2011-01-20T22:54:41 peter > Comment: different sub packages provides/obsoletes different packages.List > them in sub packages; And we generally don't fork package, why not name as > just libcreds and then update all existing packages > > > History: new 2011-01-19T12:31:57 rrware > _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
