Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Zhu, Peter J [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 9:13 AM > To: [email protected]; Zabaluev Mikhail (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) > Subject: RE: [meego-commits] 15005: Changes to Trunk:Testing/telepathy- > qt4 > > It's reverted from Trunk:Testing. You shouldn't remove yaml if it's > already maintained with yaml.
I am the maintainer. Should it be not up to me to decide how I want to maintain the package, if it's within the agreed packaging policies? > It's very easy and good and convenient to > use yaml in your case. Thanks for explaining me what is convenient for me, but I must say it's not easy, good, or convenient in my case, because I worked with RPMs for more than five years and know the nooks and crannies of the spec format and most of its macros. There is no need for me to hide that under yet another layer of syntactic quirks, which I must learn to do what I already know how to do. Cheers, Mikhail > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mikhail > Zabaluev > > Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 5:03 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [meego-commits] 15005: Changes to Trunk:Testing/telepathy- > qt4 > > > > changes files: > > -------------- > > --- telepathy-qt4.changes > > +++ telepathy-qt4.changes > > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > > +* Fri Mar 18 2011 Mikhail Zabaluev <[email protected]> - > 0.5.11 > > +- Update to the latest upstream version (BMC#14701) > > +- Removed the yaml file > > + > > ++++++ deleted files: > > --- Makefile > > --- telepathy-qt4.yaml _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
