[email protected] wrote: > Now, I want to say that again. Nobody is forcing anybody to use > spectacle, and as the wiki says, it is not mandatory. You might not > like it, thats ok, but it is being used successfully in many packages > and by many package maintainers,
> even with all of the above drawbacks, when you get used to it it is > still much easier than dealing with spec files. That's _your_ opinion, not a fact. Other people like me and Mikhail disagree. And that's ok. Fortunately it remains *optional*, thus it should be the maintainer who decides which format to use. Talk is cheap. Show me the code. -- Torvalds, Linus People can talk all they want about the advantages of Spectacle, but unless they propose to maintain the package themselves, it's Mikhail's call. Right? -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
